Richard WILCE m Mary COOPER Bristol (General)
Thanks again, Slowhands. Bristol?? Hmmmm, think I'll leave Mary Cooper as just a "Mary" unless I can unearth anything else. A Mary Cooper was bapt 22 OCT 1769 St Phillip And Jacob, Bristol, Gloucester, England, so that fits, but for a Ruardean man to marry in Bristol seems unlikely - but not impossible, of course.
Cheers
Bob
Complete thread:
- Thomas WILCE b. approx 1829 Monmouth -
patsy,
2008-02-22, 06:01
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- Thomas WILCE 1853 USA -
slowhands,
2008-02-22, 06:13
- Yeates/Wilce - patsy, 2008-02-22, 06:31
- Thomas WILCE b. approx 1829 Monmouth -
cmwilce1988,
2008-03-02, 14:00
- Thomas WILCE 1823 Ruardean -
slowhands,
2008-03-02, 21:49
- Thomas WILCE 1823 ish Ruardean -
cmwilce1988,
2008-03-04, 01:43
- Thomas WILCE 1823 Ruardean - slowhands, 2008-03-04, 02:29
- Thomas WILCE 1823 ish Ruardean -
reporter,
2008-03-04, 06:47
- Thomas WILCE 1823 ish Ruardean -
slowhands,
2008-03-04, 07:23
- Richard WILCE 1767 Ruardean -
reporter,
2008-03-04, 07:49
- Richard WILCE m Mary COOPER Bristol -
slowhands,
2008-03-04, 07:58
- Richard WILCE m Mary COOPER Bristol - reporter, 2008-03-04, 09:16
- Richard WILCE m Mary COOPER Bristol -
slowhands,
2008-03-04, 07:58
- Richard WILCE 1767 Ruardean -
reporter,
2008-03-04, 07:49
- Thomas WILCE 1823 ish Ruardean -
slowhands,
2008-03-04, 07:23
- Thomas WILCE 1823 ish Ruardean -
cmwilce1988,
2008-03-04, 01:43
- Thomas WILCE b. approx 1829 Monmouth - paulinew, 2008-03-04, 09:10
- Thomas WILCE 1823 Ruardean -
slowhands,
2008-03-02, 21:49
- Thomas WILCE b. approx 1829 Monmouth - robert33, 2009-02-09, 13:36
- Thomas WILCE 1853 USA -
slowhands,
2008-02-22, 06:13