Boy or girl? It’s in the father's genes (General)
David
Your feedback is welcome.
The relevance to Family History studies is as ChrisW has already pointed out, each of us can test this conclusion against our own findings, i.e. in our MEEK / BRAIN/ GWILLIAM/ WATKINS/ JONES/ etc trees do we see any tendancy for males with a larger no of brothers to father more sons than daughters. Then again we can choose to ignore this all together.
Personally - no parallels yet - but then it is a statisical finding :-)
regards
--
Ἀριστοτέλης A Gloster & Hereford Boy in the Forest of Dean ><((((*>
Complete thread:
- Boy or girl? It’s in the father's genes -
slowhands,
2008-12-10, 22:09
- Boy or girl? It’s in the father's genes -
ChrisW,
2008-12-11, 03:09
- Boy or girl? It’s in the father's genes - slowhands, 2008-12-11, 04:21
- Boy or girl? It’s in the father's genes -
djones,
2008-12-11, 11:55
- Boy or girl? It’s in the father's genes -
slowhands,
2008-12-11, 19:50
- Boy or girl? It’s in the father's genes - Jean Herbert, 2008-12-12, 07:17
- Boy or girl? It’s in the father's genes -
slowhands,
2008-12-11, 19:50
- Boy or girl? It’s in the father's genes -
ChrisW,
2008-12-11, 03:09