Jane Stephens bpt 1735 or 1738 ? (General)
Here's a Jane Read 1728 who could have remained unmarried
record_id 53461
Entry Number 3126
Year 1728
Month Sep
Day 12
Parents Surname READ
Child Forename(s) Jane
Father's Forename(s) Francis
Mother's Forename(s) Margaret
Mother's Surname
Place of Residence
Occupation
Officiating Minister
Event type Baptism
Memoranda
Notes
Register Reference P275 IN 1/2
Page No 4
Parish/Chapel Ruardean
Complete thread:
- Jane Stephens bpt 1735 or 1738 ? -
GrandDad,
2009-02-20, 00:58
- Jane Stephens bpt 1735 or 1738 ? -
jimashton,
2009-02-20, 01:25
- Jane Stephens bpt 1735 or 1738 ? -
reporter,
2009-02-20, 02:05
- Jane Stephens bpt 1735 or 1738 ? -
jimashton,
2009-02-20, 05:09
- Jane Stephens bpt 1735 or 1738 ? -
reporter,
2009-02-20, 05:21
- Jane Stephens bpt 1735 or 1738 ? - jimashton, 2009-02-21, 01:40
- Jane Stephens bpt 1735 or 1738 ? -
reporter,
2009-02-20, 05:21
- Jane Stephens bpt 1735 or 1738 ? -
jimashton,
2009-02-20, 05:09
- Jane Stephens bpt 1735 or 1738 ? -
reporter,
2009-02-20, 02:05
- Jane Stephens - the answer! -
reporter,
2009-02-21, 23:34
- Jane Stephens - the answer! -
GrandDad,
2009-02-22, 00:18
- Jane Stephens - the answer! - slowhands, 2009-02-22, 00:35
- Jane Stephens - the answer! -
jimashton,
2009-02-22, 01:05
- Jane Stephens - the answer! -
reporter,
2009-02-22, 01:53
- Dipper - slowhands, 2009-02-22, 02:28
- Jane Stephens - the answer! -
reporter,
2009-02-22, 01:53
- Jane Stephens - the answer! -
GrandDad,
2009-02-22, 00:18
- Jane Stephens bpt 1735 or 1738 ? -
jimashton,
2009-02-20, 01:25