Thomas Meek born 1808 Weston -U-P (General)

by fredb @, Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 11:11 (5587 days ago)

Hello Meek lovers, there are plenty about. Right this is a "Am I barking up the wrong tree" request.

I have mentioned here before that a branch of my family became Mormons and headed for the USA, as they were Mormons much of the family tree has already been done, but the Meek line stops with Thomas born around 1808, the Mormon records say born 1807 Weston under Penyard, so using our parish records I've done a little research. This post has been prompted by an E-mail from Ken Meek in Arizona which is just outside the Forest of Dean.

Thomas Meek baptised 2nd Oct 1808 mother Elizabeth, no father mentioned so Elizabeth was an unmarried mum, probably in her late teens or early 20's. There are 3 Meek families in Weston producing children during the 1780's, John and Sarah, Joseph and Ann, and George and Elizabeth, the last couple I'm thinking might be the parents of my Elizabeth, but there is no Elizabeth among their children baptised Weston, but there is an Elizabeth Meek baptised Ruardean in 1787 daughter of George and Elizabeth.

I know there is certainly no way for me to prove this is true, but one of you Meek experts may be able to say "No, this Elizabeth Meek and parents George and Elizabeth were always a Ruardean family, not Weston."

Thomas Meek by the way died in Utah in 1891, the family sailed to the US in 1866, an epidemic had killed several family members in the previous 12 months, I think they were part of an exodus of people around this time. cheers Fred

PS. Ann Ennis was the name of Thomas's wife, she was born Weston 1808, and the family is well documented at the familysearch site as part of the Benjamin Rogers Meek file

Thomas Meek born 1808 Weston -U-P

by fredb @, Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 11:46 (5587 days ago) @ fredb

Me again - There seems to be only one George Meek marriage (to Elizabeth)about this time
George Meek (widower of Ruardean) married Elizabeth Wheatstone in English Bicknor 19th Oct 1786, that fits in so well for Elizabeth born 1787 Ruardean, but do they go on to live in Weston?

Thomas MEEK born 1808 Weston -U-P

by slowhands @, proud of his ancient Dean Forest roots, Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 11:53 (5587 days ago) @ fredb

I think that a prior thread speculated the Meek / Wheatstone link with Lea, only a short distance from W u P....

--
Ἀριστοτέλης A Gloster & Hereford Boy in the Forest of Dean ><((((*>

Thomas Meek born 1808 Weston -U-P

by djones @, Rhondda Valley, Glamorgan, Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 13:58 (5587 days ago) @ fredb

The 1841 Census on Ancestry has this Meek family down as Stock ?.

They are in Weston-u-P

Thomas is given as NOT born in county (Herefordshire)

So you Gloucestershire Thomas may be right.


Regards


David

--
Rhondda Valley Boy

Thomas Meek born 1808 Weston -U-P

by fredb @, Thursday, October 22, 2009, 14:33 (5585 days ago) @ djones

Thanks for your replies, a bit more work to do cheers Fred

Thomas Meek 1808 Ruardean?

by fredb @, Monday, April 23, 2012, 17:49 (4671 days ago) @ fredb

Can anyone confirm this? Or tell me I have the wrong people. Thomas Meek baptised 2 Oct 1808 in Weston under Penyard, it only gives his mothers name as Elizabeth Meek, and it looks likely that she was the daughter of George and Elizabeth Meek baptised 3 June 1787 Ruardean. There are a few Elizabeth Meeks, and Thomas's, but as Thomas and his family are in Weston in 1841 I stayed local. Thomas married Ann Ennis.
It seems that many people in the area became Mormons, and following a bad year in 1865 when people were dropping like flies, the survivors headed for Utah. Ann Ennis's sister Jane (Smith)who was widowed was packed off to Utah years earlier with her 3 children and her mother, it was costing £50 a year to keep them on Parish relief, so it was seen as saving money to pay a one off £50 for clothing and their passage to the US.
Don't go to too much trouble with this as both families are sidelines from my Rogers family. But if you have a member of your family who disappears from census in this area around 1855-70, then they might be in Utah.

RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum