Baptism Jane HOLDER possibly Taynton - 1791 ish (Parish Records)

by admin , Forest of Dean, Tuesday, October 27, 2015, 08:32 (3348 days ago) @ Mike Pinchin

Picking up on the comment that the baptism of Sarah is not FODFHT we have checked and find it under the Surname of ROBERTS. The entry has therefore been checked against the image and we find it is entered as PROBERTS. The database has therefore been updated accordingly.

Post reply

6014 views

Complete thread:

RSS Feed of thread

Baptism Jane HOLDER possibly Taynton - 1791 ish - aussie, 2015-10-25, 08:29
- HOLDER/PROBERT/WILKES - MPGriffiths, 2015-10-25, 09:45
  - Baptism Jane HOLDER possibly Taynton - 1791 ish - aussie, 2015-10-25, 10:19
    - Baptism Jane HOLDER possibly Taynton - 1791 ish - Mike Pinchin, 2015-10-26, 22:47
      - Baptism Jane HOLDER possibly Taynton - 1791 ish - aussie, 2015-10-27, 06:23
        
        Baptism Jane HOLDER possibly Taynton - 1791 ish - aussie, 2015-10-27, 08:52
        
        Baptism Jane HOLDER possibly Taynton - 1791 ish - Mike Pinchin, 2015-10-27, 23:28
        
        Baptism Jane HOLDER possibly Taynton - 1791 ish - aussie, 2015-10-28, 20:16
      - Baptism Jane HOLDER possibly Taynton - 1791 ish - admin, 2015-10-27, 08:32
        
        Baptism Jane HOLDER possibly Taynton - 1791 ish - aussie, 2015-10-27, 10:15
        
        Baptism Jane HOLDER possibly Taynton - 1791 ish - aussie, 2015-10-27, 21:08
  - HOLDER/PROBERT/WILKES - aussie, 2020-05-31, 05:46

Forest of Dean FHT Forum

Baptism Jane HOLDER possibly Taynton - 1791 ish (Parish Records)