<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Forest of Dean FHT  Forum - Margaret Cavender Harris 1858 to?</title>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/</link>
<description>Connecting Forest of Dean Researchers World-Wide </description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Margaret Cavender Harris 1858 to? (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The usual reason for baptising a child privately would be if they were close to death then anyone could baptise the child (the idea being to save his or her soul). However it is sometimes stated when a baptism is of a nonconformist nature, e.g. RC. However many RCs and protestant non-conformists would baptise their child in their own faith as well as at the C of E. The latter though usually relates to the period before the date you have quoted. In the RC branch of my family there are two marriage dates too, usually one the day before the other as they married in both the CofE and their own church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=18803</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=18803</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 07:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>rookancestrybest</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Margaret Cavender HARRIS 1858 to? (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at this stage I cannot find a BMD entry for the birth - however it may be there</p>
<p>so if we assume an infant death - a record of death might be pushing it if the birth was not registered. A burial would still be possible, again have to question if the church recognised the baptism and hence allowed a burial in consecrated ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=18726</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=18726</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 09:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>slowhands</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Margaret Cavender HARRIS 1858 to? (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your reply and yes, the Cavanaugh connection is correct though I don't know who the guilty party was. If a baby died soon after birth would it have been acceptable for it to be buried without being registered or having any record of burial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=18725</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=18725</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 09:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>anne crossley</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Margaret Cavender HARRIS 1858 to? (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A private baptism was often conducted at home for a sick child.</p>
<p><br />
I assume this is the Cavender (?) family connection<br />
1861<br />
 James Cavanaugh abt 1811  Guernsey, Channel Islands Head  East Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
Eliza Cavanaugh  abt 1810  Little Dean, Gloucestershire, England Wife  East Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Thomas Cavanaugh abt 1835  Little Dean, Gloucestershire, England Son  East Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 James Cavanaugh  abt 1837  Harley[FLAXLEY], Gloucestershire, England Son  East Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Benjamin Cavanaugh  abt 1842  Little Dean, Gloucestershire, England Son  East Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Catherine Cavanaugh  abt 1850  Little Dean, Gloucestershire, England Daughter  East Dean, Gloucestershire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=18724</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=18724</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 03:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>slowhands</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Margaret Cavender Harris 1858 to?</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baby Margaret was baptised 12/11/1858, illegitimate daughter of Sarah. The margin note says 'privately'. Can anyone tell me what that would mean. Would the baby have been poorly perhaps. I cannot find any further trace of her, living or dead. Any ideas greatly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=18723</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=18723</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 03:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>anne crossley</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
