<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Forest of Dean FHT  Forum - Littledean gap in baptism records? -</title>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/</link>
<description>Connecting Forest of Dean Researchers World-Wide </description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Littledean gap in baptism records? - (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer is it depends on the time !</p>
<p>In the timeframe you are researching the Forest was &quot;extra parocial&quot; i.e. no Parish church, so if the family lived in the EP area then they might travel/walk to whichever Church / minister they &quot;trusted&quot; :-)</p>
<p><br />
Littledean / Flaxley / Abenhall are all convenient for the East Dean Extra Parocial area</p>
<p>for map see .. <a href="http://www.forest-of-dean.net/joomla/the-forest-of-dean/maps-of-the-forest">http://www.forest-of-dean.net/joomla/the-forest-of-dean/maps-of-the-forest</a>    ( map of early parishes)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=19259</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=19259</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>slowhands</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Littledean gap in baptism records? - (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your reply. I am able to make more sense of the records if I combine the parishes. Based on your experience, would you say that the forest people would change parishes even if they lived in the same place for generations?  Is it likely that my BURGUMs lived in Littledean but used Abenhall or Flaxley for their baptisms and marraiges?</p>
<p>Don Burgham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=19257</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=19257</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>donburg</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Littledean gap in baptism records? - (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>status of transcriptions for Littledean :-</p>
<p>Category  Media  Parish  Event Type  Period  Transcriber  Last Updated on Site  <br />
On-Website   Image   Littledean   Baptisms   1684-1714   Nolene Lossau   2008-05-09   <br />
On-Website   Image   Littledean   Baptism   1714-1783   Jeff Gould   2007-10-05   <br />
On-Website   Image   Littledean   Baptism   1783-1812   Joyce Johnston   2007-12-07   <br />
On-Website   Fiche   Littledean   Baptism   1813-1835   Ray Davies   2006-07-09 <br />
On-Website   Fiche   Littledean   Baptism   1836-1859   Ray Davies   2006-08-04   <br />
On-Website   Fiche   Littledean   Baptism   1859-1902   Ray Davies   2006-09-11  <br />
In-Progress   Image   Littledean   Baptisms   1903-1987   Nichola Elsigood       TBD</p>
<p>there may be gaps in the original material (?)</p>
<p><br />
i wonder if this is a &quot;missing&quot; record<br />
1703 BURBAN Wiliam Baptism Littledean More detail</p>
<p>or they were using Abenhall rather than Littledean :-</p>
<p>1687 BURGUM Edwin Baptism Abenhall More detail</p>
<p>or Flaxley :-</p>
<p>1725 BERGUM Mary Baptism Flaxley More detail <br />
1726 BERGUM Frances Baptism Flaxley More detail <br />
1730 BERGUM Charles Baptism Flaxley More detail <br />
1731 BERGUM John Baptism Flaxley More detail <br />
1733 BERGUM Margarett Baptism Flaxley More detail <br />
1737 BERGUM William Baptism Flaxley More detail</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=19249</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=19249</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>slowhands</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Littledean gap in baptism records? - researching BURGUM</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been analyzing the Littledean baptism records in my research of BURGUM / BURGHAM. I have come into a major gap of baptisms between the years of 1688 to 1743.  However, there continue to be marraiges and deaths during this period. Does anyone have advice or run across this problem in their research?  </p>
<p>Thank you,<br />
Don Burgham<br />
Houston, TX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=19247</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=19247</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>donburg</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
