Men in Armour for Gloucestershire 1608

Anelme HANMAN - Sailor A20 (age 20) tallest stature, Sailor, Elmore

Some HANDMAN - various other places.

http://www.coaley.net/glos1608/index.php

Well, it looks as though Hanman is a real possibility. And possibly Churcham is de Eaden (the children were baptised in Churcham).

But I am not sure how to chase this further - I cannot find Alice's or Jonathan's baptism - or even burials. If they were married in St. Peter's 'by invitation' could they be buried there?. They were presumably born c 1700 at the latest, more likely 1690ish. This makes Henry Hanman and Anna Ball the only likely candidates for Alice's parents.

The Hares seem to have large gaps...

You are getting into "misty" times with the records/registers, one to consider

Year: 1705
Month: Dec
Day: 20
Parents_Surname: HANMAN
Child_Forenames: not stated
Fathers_Forenames: Thomas
Mothers_Forenames: Elizabeth
Mothers_Surname:
Residence: Over
Occupation:
Officiating_Minister: Tho[mas] Thache Vic[ar]
Event: Baptism
Memoranda:
Notes: Any abbreviated forenames have been expanded to the full name
Register_Reference: P83 IN 1/1
Page_Number: 89
Parish_Chapel: Churcham

Churcham / Minsterworth not too far apart

Year: 1700
Month: Mar
Day: 10
Parents_Surname: HANMAN
Child_Forenames: Alice
Fathers_Forenames: Thomas
Mothers_Forenames: Elizabeth
Mothers_Surname:
Residence:
Occupation: Farrier
Officiating_Minister:
Event: Baptism
Memoranda:
Notes: Old style date 1699/1700
Register_Reference: P218 IN 1/1
Page_Number:
Parish_Chapel: Minsterworth

http://ww3.gloucestershire.gov.uk/genealogy/Search.aspx

But I am not sure how to chase this further - I cannot find Alice's or Jonathan's baptism - or even burials. If they were married in St. Peter's 'by invitation' could they be buried there?. They were presumably born c 1700 at the latest, more likely 1690ish. This makes Henry Hanman and Anna Ball the only likely candidates for Alice's parents.

The Hares seem to have large gaps...

Henry HANMAN married at Fretherne to Anna BALL from Wheatenhurst - 5 April 1687

Anselm HANMAN from Elmore - married at Berkeley - Elizabeth HOBBY - 20 December 1753

John HANMAN from Elmore - married at Berkeley - Mary KENN - 22 February 1753

William HANMAN - married at Glos St John the Baptist - Ann LEWIS - 23 September 1793

and Brides

Ann HANMAN married Stephen KING at Elmore - 9 December 1697
Elizabeth HANMAN married John TURNER at Elmore - 30 November 1721
Elizabeth HANMAN married by Lic at Glos. S. Michael, William STOCK - 12 Jan 1779
Hanah HANMAN married (John DAVIS from Arlingham) at Fretherne - 12 April 1701
Joan HANMAN married John WILKINS at Fretherne - 26 May 1684
Mary HANMAN married Thomas HARRIS at Moreton Valance - 2 November 1695
Mary HANMAN from Berkeley married Joseph PEARCE (wid) at Slimbridge - 27 November 1755
Mary HANMAN married William HARRIS from S. Owen at Glos. St Mary de Crypt - 14 April 1772
Sarah HANMAN married John WATHEN at Elmore - 16 February 1719
Anne HANMON married Thomas ALDRIDGE at Arlingham - 25 April 1751
Mary HANNIMAN? of Cold Sapperton - married John DYER of Cold Sapperton at Hampnett - 5 November 1751

James HARE of Hardwick, married Hannah HALE at Fretherne - 12 June 1724 (where Jonathan HARE is from)
Thomas HARE married Martha WOOD at Slimbridge - 20 August 1764

Can't see any female HARE marriages or
the surname/variants HUNMANDE

Fod Records

15 May 1720

Jonathon HARE - residence: Hrdwick

married

Alicia HUNMANDE

residence: de eaden (?Upleadon)

---

Ancestry - two baptism at Hardwick

Ann HARE - 19 April 1747 - James & Mrey

Richard - 25 September 1748 - James & Marey

--

Kings Stanley Marriages (on the net)

James HARE of Hardwick married Mary WOOD - 31 October 1743

15 May 1720 Alicia Hunmande married Jonathan Hare in Gloucester Cathderal. Could this be Alicia (Alice) Hunman de somewhere? (Her residence is listed as de Eaden but I cannot find Eaden).

I wonder if the record is CHURCHAM but transcribed as "de eaden" because that is the way the handwriting looks - "ch" read as "d" or "de"

I have found their children but not their forebears. Could anyone be married in the Cathedral?

I suspect that you would have needed " an introduction" to marry in St Peters unless it was your parish church i.e. the Precincts.

Any help with Hares or Hunman(de)s greatly appreciated.

Year: 1720
Month: May
Day: 15
Grooms_Surname: HARE
Grooms_Forenames: Jonathon
Grooms_Age:
Groom_Condition:
Grooms_Occupation:
Grooms_Residence: Hrdwick {HARDWICKE}
Grooms_Fathers_Surname:
Grooms_Fathers_Forenames:
Grooms_Fathers_Occupation:
Brides_Surname: HUNMANDE
Brides_Forenames: Alicia
Brides_Age:
Brides_Condition:
Brides_Occupation:
Brides_Residence: de eaden {CHURCHAM}
Brides_Fathers_Surname:
Brides_Fathers_Forenames:
Brides_Fathers_Occupation:
Licence_or_Banns:
Date_of_Banns:
Signature_or_Mark:
Witness_1:
Witness_2:
Other_Witnesses:
Officiating_Minister:
Event: Marriage
Memoranda:
Notes:
Register_Reference: PMF154/2
Page_Number: 53
Parish_Chapel: Gloucester Cathedral {St PETERS}