<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Forest of Dean FHT  Forum - Elizabeth Susan GITTINGS - B 1887 Staunton  - Missing !</title>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/</link>
<description>Connecting Forest of Dean Researchers World-Wide </description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Elizabeth Susan GITTINGS - B 1887 Staunton  - Missing ! (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you both Jeff &amp; mrsbruso for your comments.</p>
<p>As you have stated even today we complain about some names we have been given.</p>
<p>Can we possibly imagine what our ancestors would be thinking if they could see us delving into their past some two hundred years later.</p>
<p>Perhaps in 2200 we may be able to print out a picture/video straight from our human memory bank.</p>
<p>No doubt tapping messages on a computer will be stone age technology.</p>
<p>To man and the future...</p>
<p>Forest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=35117</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=35117</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>unknown</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Elizabeth Susan GITTINGS - B 1887 Staunton  - Missing ! (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the apparent change of names:  My great uncle, always referred to amongst the family as &quot;Uncle Jim&quot; was actually Thomas James . . . and my grandfather, Charles George, mostly known as &quot;Charlie&quot;, is recorded as George in the 1891 census.  Why -- who knows, although his newly minted stepfather giving the names as head of household might possibly have had something to do with it.  Additionally, when my grandmother was travelling, she missed a flight.  My uncle asked the airline to find his mother, &quot;Nellie&quot;, and they couldn't find any record of her.  It was only when he called my mother to report her missing that she told him her travel documents listed her actual first name, which was Patience!  And my brother, christened Leo, is known to all and sundry as &quot;Bill&quot;.  I don't think any of our cousins are aware that his first name is not actually William.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=35092</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=35092</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 01:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>mrsbruso</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Elizabeth Susan GITTINGS - B 1887 Staunton  - Missing ! (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Forest,<br />
as I'm sure you know this site's PRs carry Baptism Records for 97 different Gittings', including that of my Aunt Hilda Mary Gittings b1911. However only TWO of these were recorded at Staunton nr Newent, as below:</p>
<p>Record_ID: 251173 <br />
Entry_Number: 121 <br />
Year: 1890 <br />
Month: Mar <br />
Day: 21 <br />
Parents_Surname: GITTINGS <br />
Child_Forenames: Susanne Elizabeth <br />
Fathers_Forenames: John <br />
Mothers_Forenames: Fanny <br />
Mothers_Surname:  <br />
Residence: Staunton <br />
Occupation: Labourer <br />
Officiating_Minister: J W Hayes Off Minister <br />
Event: C <br />
Memoranda:  <br />
Notes:  <br />
Register_Reference:  <br />
Page_Number: 16 <br />
Parish_Chapel: Staunton near Newent <br />
Soundex: G352 </p>
<p><br />
Record_ID: 251185 <br />
Entry_Number: 133 <br />
Year: 1891 <br />
Month: Oct <br />
Day: 18 <br />
Parents_Surname: GITTINGS <br />
Child_Forenames: Ada Kate <br />
Fathers_Forenames: John  <br />
Mothers_Forenames: Fanny <br />
Mothers_Surname:  <br />
Residence: Staunton <br />
Occupation: Labourer <br />
Officiating_Minister: T Hayes <br />
Event: C <br />
Memoranda: St Lukes Day <br />
Notes:  <br />
Register_Reference:  <br />
Page_Number: 17 <br />
Parish_Chapel: Staunton near Newent <br />
Soundex: G352 </p>
<p>It seems highly unlikely to me that these are not your family. Clearly it seems the girl's wern't overkeen on their baptised first names, but that's hardly unusual, indeed census's sometimes record a person's nickname nevermind precise baptism names, it all depends what was being used by the family at the time. Similarly an error of a few years comparing actual vs census ages is not unusual, this is quite common for all sorts of reasons.</p>
<p>Their parents' marriage record from this site is:<br />
Record_ID: 22510 <br />
Entry_Number: 55 <br />
Year: 1875 <br />
Month: May <br />
Day: 17 <br />
Grooms_Surname: GITTINGS <br />
Grooms_Forenames: John <br />
Grooms_Age: 22 <br />
Groom_Condition: Bachelor <br />
Grooms_Occupation: Labourer <br />
Grooms_Residence: Newent <br />
Grooms_Fathers_Surname: Gittings <br />
Grooms_Fathers_Forenames: Thomas <br />
Grooms_Fathers_Occupation: Labourer <br />
Brides_Surname: WARNER <br />
Brides_Forenames: Fanny <br />
Brides_Age: 20 <br />
Brides_Condition: Spinster <br />
Brides_Occupation: [not stated] <br />
Brides_Residence: Newent <br />
Brides_Fathers_Surname: Warner <br />
Brides_Fathers_Forenames: George <br />
Brides_Fathers_Occupation: Labourer <br />
Licence_or_Banns: Banns <br />
Date_of_Banns: [not stated] <br />
Signature_or_Mark: both mark <br />
Witness_1: Mark of John Spenser <br />
Witness_2: Mark of Emma Spenser <br />
Other_Witnesses:  <br />
Officiating_Minister: J Nosworthy Off Curate <br />
Event: Marriage <br />
Memoranda:  <br />
Notes:  <br />
Register_Reference: P225 IN 1/33 <br />
Page_Number: 28 <br />
Parish_Chapel: Newent <br />
Soundex_Groom: G352 <br />
Soundex_Bride: W656 </p>
<p>I hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=35018</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=35018</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>Jefff</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Elizabeth Susan GITTINGS - B 1887 Staunton  - Missing ! (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi M P Griffiths</p>
<p>Re last entry - <br />
the 1901 Census shows Elizabeth aged 14 which is correct from 1887.<br />
Also shows her family and young sister Kate, and correct age, all residing at Barn Lane, Corse, Nr Glos. Which seems to confirm the correct line. Have no knowledge in family of a Susanne.</p>
<p>Thanks  Forest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=35005</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=35005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>unknown</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Elizabeth Susan GITTINGS - B 1887 Staunton  - Missing ! (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I search the 1911 census</p>
<p>There is an Elizabeth Susan GITTINGS, born Staunton 1888 age 23,  living in Upton on Severn - not sure how to access this via Ancestry - and looking at FOD records this could be her.</p>
<p>Christening at Staunton Near Newent</p>
<p>Susanne Elizabeth GITTINGS, 21 march 1890 <strong>parents John &amp; Fanny</strong></p>
<p><br />
and death</p>
<p>born 1887 of Elizabeth S GITTINGS - J/F/M Qtr 1963 age 76, Gloucester Rural</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=34999</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=34999</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>m p griffiths</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Elizabeth &quot;Lizzy&quot; GITTINGS - B 1887 Staunton  - Missing ! (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Slowhands/MP Griffiths for your help.<br />
Having checked ages it seems the Hereford line is the correct one.<br />
Forest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=34998</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=34998</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>unknown</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Elizabeth &quot;Lizzy&quot; GITTINGS - B 1887 Staunton  - Missing ! (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>?  Freebdm</p>
<p>Death: O/N/D Qtr 1904, Hereford District</p>
<p>Elizabeth GITTINGS, age 18</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=34997</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=34997</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>m p griffiths</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Elizabeth &quot;Lizzy&quot; GITTINGS - B 1887- (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1911 Candidate<br />
 DAVIES ELIZABETH F 1887 24 Weobley Herefordshire born Staunton<br />
 <br />
Marriage candidate<br />
 <br />
Name: Lizzie Elizabeth Gittins <br />
Date of Registration: Apr-May-Jun 1904 <br />
Registration district: Stourbridge <br />
Inferred County: Worcestershire <br />
Volume Number: 6c <br />
Page Number: 274<br />
 Spouse :-George Venn or Harold Joseph B Chance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=34996</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=34996</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>slowhands</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Elizabeth &quot;Lizzy&quot; GITTINGS - B 1887 Staunton  - Missing !</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth GITTINGS from Staunton Worce goes missing after 1901 ....</p>
<p>1901<br />
John Gittings abt 1853 Redmarley, Worcestershire, England Head Corse, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Fanny Gittings  abt 1857 N Wife Corse, Gloucestershire  <br />
Elizabeth Gittings abt 1887 Staunton, Worcestershire, England Daughter Corse, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Kate Gittings  abt 1892 Staunton, Worcestershire, England Daughter Corse, Gloucestershire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=34994</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=34994</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>unknown</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
