<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Forest of Dean FHT  Forum - The Jones of Dymock - children of John &amp; Ellen</title>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/</link>
<description>Connecting Forest of Dean Researchers World-Wide </description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>The Jones of Dymock - children of John &amp; Ellen</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have been tracing this family for some time now and more recently a group of us got together to discuss findings etc.  Someone produced a newspaper report, with photograph, about John &amp; Ellen who had celebrated a special wedding anniversary and in the report it stated that they had 11 children, 7 boys and 4 girls.</p>
<p>To our horror, we discovered we had only found 6 boys and 4 girls.  Namely,<br />
Henry (1873), Thomas (1875), Amelia (1877), George (1879), Hubert (1881), Andrew (1884), Ann (1886), Alice (1888), Florence (1891), and James (1895).</p>
<p>John &amp; Ellen Jones were married on 26 December 1870, and in view of the number of children and the space between each, I think it is possible that they could have had a child between 1870 when they married and 1873 when the first child was born.  It could also be that perhaps a child was born and subsequently died.</p>
<p>One of our group had, in fact, got 11 on her tree, the extra one being a <strong>Charles</strong>.  However, she does not know where this info came from and has no other supporting evidence.</p>
<p>If anyone can offer any advice, it would be most appreciated.</p>
<p>Gwen Sabin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=24195</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=24195</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>gwensabin</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
