<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Forest of Dean FHT  Forum - Lucretia HARPER nee WILLIAMS 1871-1935 Whitecroft/Pillowell</title>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/</link>
<description>Connecting Forest of Dean Researchers World-Wide </description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Lucretia HARPER nee WILLIAMS 1871-1935 Whitecroft/Pillowell (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harper family </p>
<p>Is your father in law related to Joseph* and Mary (Morse) Harper?  They had at least three sons - John, Jonathan* and Benjamin.  *both parish clerks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38980</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38980</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>dormin</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thomas Morton &amp; Eliza Lucretia HARPER, FoD =&gt; Yorkshire (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, sorry for my mistake re 1913, altho I would hopefully have spotted my error and removed it prior to finishing the post which rather &quot;grew&quot; on me and I was still working on it when you posted. I always revisit to check and properly punctuate etc. But thanks again for guiding me. <br />
Yes agreed re the miners moving for perfectly normal reasons as I said just beforehand, I was nodding towards the original post and family rumours of misdeameanors, not making a categorical statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38723</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38723</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>Jefff</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thomas Morton &amp; Eliza Lucretia HARPER, FoD =&gt; Yorkshire (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><br />
I suspect this may be their child, correct Districts, sadly evading the 1901 &amp; 1911 Census's :</p>
<p>Births Dec 1902   (&gt;99%)<br />
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
HARPER  Thomas Mercer     Northallerton  9d 673    </p>
<p><br />
Deaths Sep 1913   (&gt;99%)<br />
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
Harper  Thomas M  10  York  9d 2    </p>
<p><br />
CONCLUSION: <br />
altho I would like clarification, please, wrt second name initials on 1901 Census form, I think the &quot;6 yrs marriage&quot; on the 1911 Census was an error on the form (perhaps even deliberate ??) and that yes it is one and the same Thomas Morton Harper throughout this timeline. I see no reason why a Dean coalminer couldn't move to Yorkshire coalfields to work.</p>
<p>Re the reasons for this long migration, perhaps there are criminal records (Ancestry ?) or other public issues that MAY have been reported in local newspapers (search this forum for info) at the time. Have either of them got family in Yorkshire which could influence their choice of safe haven ?.</p>
</blockquote><p>The 1911 give 1 child of  family and living, therefore the Northallerton child is probably not related and should be on the 1911 census if he dies in 1913</p>
<p>Many Foresters moved to Yorkshire in search of work and pay nothing more sinister</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38722</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38722</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>slowhands</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thomas HARPER confusion ! (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Paul for confirming that, you can hopefully understand my reason for asking, especially as the other details matched so closely. I was not doubting your post, just didnt know your source whether image or transcription.</p>
<p>With my just having LDS for census access, and they're renowned(so I gather) as being inaccurate, it seemed reasonable to hope the Js were Ls etc.</p>
<p>It would appear I should not spend hours searching LDS etc and instead subscribe to Ancestry etc for far quicker and more accurate answers, albeit in my opinion a lot less fun trying to workout answers, as long as they are correct ones of course!.<br />
Ah well live and learn...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38721</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38721</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>Jefff</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thomas Morton &amp; Eliza Lucretia HARPER, FoD =&gt; Yorkshire (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&quot;<em>This looks like the same &amp; correct houshold as per Paul's post above, altho it would be good to know for sure from the actual Census image whether the &quot;J&quot; could in fact be actually an &quot;L&quot; for Lucretia, or the &quot;F&quot; to in fact be &quot;M&quot; for Morton. </em>&quot;</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>The details were taken from an image of the census return, not a transcription.  The &quot;F&quot; is consistent with other &quot;Fs&quot; on the page and the &quot;J&quot; is consistent with other &quot;Js&quot; on the page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38720</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38720</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>Paul Andrews</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lucretia HARPER nee WILLIAMS 1871-1935 Whitecroft/Pillowell (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hi </p>
<p>I'm currently looking into my father in laws family, the Harpers and utilising your excellent records have come across an anomoly. Thomas Moreton Harper is shown as having married Eliza Lucretia Williams in 1891 at Coleford. However, by 1911 Thomas is living in Bramley, near Rotherham. The 1911 Census shows him married to Eliza but that they have only been married for 6 years. My father in law understands that Thomas was a free-forester in the Forest of Dean, but believes he had this taken away from him due to some matter that the family have never disclosed. Do you know of anyway I could establish if there is any base to these rumours and if these are one and the same people. Any help/information would be appreciated. </p>
<p>As for the family tree, I've taken this back, so far, to the mid 1700's, including at least one family member who was a parish clerk in or around Ruradean. (Jonathan Harper).</p>
</blockquote><p>1871 Whitecroft<br />
James Williams 34 <br />
Harriet Williams 36 <br />
William T Williams 12 <br />
James T Williams 10 <br />
Francis Williams 7 <br />
John Williams 5 <br />
Birtha Williams 2 </p>
<p><br />
Name: Lucretia Williams <br />
Date of Registration: Oct-Nov-Dec 1871 <br />
Registration district: Monmouth <br />
Inferred County: Monmouthshire <br />
Volume: 11a <br />
Page: 27  </p>
<p>1881<br />
James Williams  abt 1838 Longhope, Hereford, England Head West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Harriet Williams  abt 1839 Bradley Hill E Dean, Gloucestershire, England Wife West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Wm. Thomas Williams  abt 1859 Bradley Hill, Gloucestershire, England Son West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 James Thomas Williams abt 1860 Bradley Hill, Gloucestershire, England Son West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 John Williams abt 1866 Bradley Hill, Gloucestershire, England Son West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Bertha Williams  abt 1869 Bradley Hill, Gloucestershire, England Daughter West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Lucretia Williams  abt 1872 Bradley Hill, Gloucestershire, England Daughter West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Matilda Williams  abt 1874 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England Daughter West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Tom Williams  abt 1876 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England Son West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Amos Williams  abt 1879 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England Son West Dean, Gloucestershire  </p>
<p>next door to</p>
<p> Thomas Harper  abt 1843 Ruardean, Gloucestershire, England Head West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Elizabeth Harper abt 1841 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England Wife West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Moreton Harper  abt 1872 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England Son West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Elizabeth Harper  abt 1873 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England Daughter West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Albert J. Harper  abt 1876 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England Son West Dean, Gloucestershire <br />
 <br />
1891 Coleway Lane End<br />
James Williams abt 1837 Alderford, [CINDERFORD]Gloucestershire, England Head West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Harriet Williams  abt 1837 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England Wife West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Lucrelia Williams abt 1872 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England Daughter West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
Tom Williams abt 1876 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England Son West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Amos Williams  abt 1879 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England Son West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Simon Williams abt 1882 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England Son West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Lucy Williams  abt 1884 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England Granddaughter West Dean, Gloucestershire  <br />
 Marton Harper [Williams]  abt 1872 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England Lodger West Dean, Gloucestershire (future Husband)</p>
<p><br />
Year: 1891 <br />
Month: Jun<br />
Day: 15 <br />
Grooms_Surname: HARPER <br />
Grooms_Forenames: Thomas Morton <br />
Grooms_Age: 19 <br />
Groom_Condition: Bachelor <br />
Grooms_Occupation: Collier <br />
Grooms_Residence: Broadwell Lane End <br />
Grooms_Fathers_Surname: Harper <br />
Grooms_Fathers_Forenames: Thomas <br />
Grooms_Fathers_Occupation: Labourer <br />
Brides_Surname: WILLIAMS <br />
Brides_Forenames: Eliza Lucretia <br />
Brides_Age: 19 <br />
Brides_Condition: Spinster <br />
Brides_Occupation: [not stated] <br />
Brides_Residence: Broadwell Lane End <br />
Brides_Fathers_Surname: Williams <br />
Brides_Fathers_Forenames: James <br />
Brides_Fathers_Occupation: Labourer <br />
Licence_or_Banns: [not stated] <br />
Date_of_Banns:  <br />
Signature_or_Mark: Both sign <br />
Witness_1: Frank Williams <br />
Witness_2: Matilda Williams <br />
Other_Witnesses:  <br />
Officiating_Minister: A W Cornwall <br />
Event: Marriage <br />
Memoranda:  <br />
Notes:  <br />
Register_Reference: P93 IN 1/11 <br />
Page_Number: 95 <br />
Parish_Chapel: Coleford </p>
<p>1901<br />
Thomas F Harper abt 1872 Bream, Gloucestershire, England Head Rawmarsh, Yorkshire  <br />
 Eliza J Harper  abt 1872 Whitecroft, Gloucestershire, England Wife Rawmarsh, Yorkshire </p>
<p><br />
1911 Village Street Bramley Nr Rotherham Yorkshire married 6 years 1 child and 0 children died<br />
Thomas Morton Harper 39 Bream nr Lydney<br />
Eliza Lucretia Harper 39 Pillowell nr Lydney<br />
Elizabeth Harriett Harper 3 Rotherham</p>
<p>The 6 years does seem odd as well as waiting 16 years for a child.</p>
<p><br />
Name: Eliza L Harper <br />
Birth Date: abt 1872 <br />
Date of Registration: Apr-May-Jun 1935 <br />
Age at Death: 63 <br />
Registration district: Rotherham <br />
Inferred County: Yorkshire West Riding <br />
Volume: 9c <br />
Page: 773</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38719</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38719</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>slowhands</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thomas Morton &amp; Eliza Lucretia HARPER, FoD =&gt; Yorkshire (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot find Eliza's birth/baptism for certain (ie Lucretia as second name) on FoD,FreeBMD or GlosBMD ?. Similarly, albeit only via LDS, I cannot find her for certain in the census's, but Elizabeth is clearly a very popular Williams name of the period. I wonder if she adopted the Lucretia name &quot;unofficially&quot; and was just baptised Elizabth as so many William's girls were ?.<br />
She's described as a spinster in the marriage, and I can see no evidence Williams isn't her original maiden name.</p>
<p>I see from their marriage her father is James Williams &amp; witnesses are Frank &amp; Matilda Williams, Thomas &amp; Eliza's daughter in 1911 is Eliza Harriet Morton.<br />
I think these names suggest this is her in LDS 1881 Census:</p>
<p>&quot;England and Wales Census, 1881,&quot; <br />
name: Lucretia Williams  <br />
age: 9  <br />
gender: Female  <br />
birth year: 1872  <br />
birthplace: Bradley Hill, Gloucestershire, England  <br />
relationship to head of household: Daughter  <br />
marital condition: Single  <br />
profession/occupation: Scholar  <br />
address: Mill Hill  <br />
census place: West Dean (Gloucs), Monmouthshire, England  <br />
disability:  <br />
record type: Household  <br />
family history library film: 1342259  <br />
the national archives reference: RG11  <br />
piece/folio: 5224 / 107  <br />
page number: 14  <br />
 <br />
Household Gender Age Birthplace <br />
head  James Williams  M 43 Longhope, Herefordshire, England  <br />
wife  Harriet Williams  F 42 Bradley Hill E Dean, Gloucestershire, England  <br />
son  Wm Thomas Williams  M 22 Bradley Hill, Gloucestershire, England  <br />
son  James Thomas Williams  M 21 Bradley Hill, Gloucestershire, England  <br />
son  John Williams  M 15 Bradley Hill, Gloucestershire, England  <br />
daughter  Bertha Williams  F 12 Bradley Hill, Gloucestershire, England  <br />
daughter  Lucretia Williams  F 9 Bradley Hill, Gloucestershire, England  <br />
daughter  Matilda Williams  F 7 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England  <br />
son  Tom Williams  M 5 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England  <br />
son  Amos Williams  M 2 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England  </p>
<p>This Census transcription shows father James as a &quot;ry lbr&quot; = railway labourer perhaps ??, but the three oldest sons are clearly shown as coal miners. They appear to now be residing at &quot;Mill Hill West Dean&quot;. </p>
<p>So maybe she was Baptised as Lucretia, and it's the more likely and traditional Elizabeth she's adopted ?. She grewup in a household full of coal miners, perhaps &quot;leading&quot; her to meet Thomas Morton ?. She then gets marrried to a man baptised at... &quot;Mill Hill&quot; (see above), altho by then he's resident at Broadwell near their place of marriage.</p>
<p><br />
From GlosBMD:</p>
<p>Child Surname Child Forename Father Surname Mother Surname Mother's Former Name Year District Office Register Entry <br />
WILLIAMS Lucretia WILLIAMS WILLIAMS CARTER 1871 Forest of Dean Monmouth, Coleford 28 69 </p>
<p>and on FreeBMD:<br />
Surname   Given Name   District   Volume   Page   Transcribers   <br />
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
Births Dec 1871 <br />
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
Williams Lucretia Monmouth 11a 27 BillHo  <br />
WILLIAMS Lucretia Monmouth 11a 27 vat </p>
<p>To my surprise I see a LOT of Lucretia Williams in South Wales thri the 1800s, so ??</p>
<p>That said still not easier to find as Lucretia, so back to Eliza and in 1901 as posted earlier:<br />
&quot;England and Wales Census, 1901,&quot; <br />
name: Eliza J Harper  <br />
event: Census  <br />
event date: 31 Mar 1901  <br />
gender:  <br />
age: 29  <br />
relationship to head of household: Wife  <br />
birthplace: Whitecroft, Gloucestershire  <br />
record type: Household  <br />
registration district: Rotherham  <br />
sub-district: Rawmarsh  <br />
ecclesiastical parish: Christ Church Parkgate  <br />
civil parish: Rawmarsh  <br />
county: Yorkshire (West Riding)  <br />
(Sorry cannot see whole household yet)</p>
<p>This looks like the same &amp; correct houshold as per Paul's post above, altho it would be good to know for sure from the actual Census image whether the &quot;J&quot; could in fact be actually an &quot;L&quot; for Lucretia, or the &quot;F&quot; to in fact be &quot;M&quot; for Morton. </p>
<p>???<br />
As stated originally, the 1911 Census clearly shows the couple were married 6 years, hopefully this link works(??)<br />
<a href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/iexec?htx=view&amp;r=5538&amp;dbid=2352&amp;iid=RG14_28139_0443_03&amp;pid=31285285&amp;noredir=true">http://search.ancestry.co.uk/iexec?htx=view&amp;r=5538&amp;dbid=2352&amp;iid=RG14_28139...</a><br />
So in conflict with the 1891 Marriage Record at Coleford Chapel, ie 20 years !.<br />
Could the FoD PR be incorrectly transcribed, possibly but unlikely ?. </p>
<p>HOWEVER the above 1901 Census clearly shows Eliza as &quot;wife&quot; &amp; &quot;Harper&quot;, so indicating a clear error on the later 1911 Census form, there are a few other form errors altho this seems an odd one to make.</p>
<p><br />
Further searching FreeBMD I find:</p>
<p>Surname   Given Name   Age   District   Volume   Page   Transcriber   <br />
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
Deaths Jun 1935 <br />
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
Harper Eliza L. 63yrs Rotherham 9c 773 sarahsmum <br />
(giving birth abt 1872 !)</p>
<p>and:</p>
<p>Deaths Jun 1944 <br />
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
Harper Thomas M. 72 Rotherham 9c 627 smt <br />
(again dates fit)</p>
<p>SO it seems this is indeed this couple's timeline.</p>
<p><br />
I suspect this may be their child, correct Districts, sadly evading the 1901 &amp; 1911 Census's :</p>
<p>Births Dec 1902   (&gt;99%)<br />
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
HARPER  Thomas Mercer     Northallerton  9d 673    </p>
<p><br />
Deaths Sep 1913   (&gt;99%)<br />
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
Harper  Thomas M  10  York  9d 2    </p>
<p><br />
CONCLUSION: <br />
altho I would like clarification, please, wrt second name initials on 1901 Census form, I think the &quot;6 yrs marriage&quot; on the 1911 Census was an error on the form (perhaps even deliberate ??) and that yes it is one and the same Thomas Morton Harper throughout this timeline. I see no reason why a Dean coalminer couldn't move to Yorkshire coalfields to work.</p>
<p>Re the reasons for this long migration, perhaps there are criminal records (Ancestry ?) or other public issues that MAY have been reported in local newspapers (search this forum for info) at the time. Have either of them got family in Yorkshire which could influence their choice of safe haven ?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38718</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38718</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>Jefff</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thomas HARPER, 1871-1897, son Thos Morton b1871 et al. (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps as they are from a shared datum reference (?)   FoDFH, FreeBMD and GlosBMD websites all agree that Thomas Moreton Harper is baptised 1871 and marries Eliza Lucretia Williams in 1891, both Monmouth District. Thomas's birthdate matches that of the above FoD Mining Record. I cannot see any other Thomas's with similar names to get confused with, Morton is not a common name at all, thankfully.</p>
<p>Record_ID: 4194 <br />
Entry_Number: 786 <br />
Year: 1871 <br />
Month: Dec <br />
Day: 10 <br />
Parents_Surname: HARPER <br />
Child_Forenames: Thomas Morton <br />
Fathers_Forenames: Thomas <br />
Mothers_Forenames: Elizabeth <br />
Mothers_Surname:  <br />
Residence: Mill Hill <br />
Occupation: Haulier <br />
Officiating_Minister: J. F. Gosling <br />
Event: Baptism <br />
Memoranda: Sponsors Albert James Reuben Nash Decima Ward <br />
Notes:  <br />
Register_Reference: P57 IN 1/3 <br />
Page_Number: 99 <br />
Parish_Chapel: Bream <br />
Soundex: H616 </p>
<p>Probable sibling:<br />
Record ID 4328 <br />
Entry Number 130 <br />
Year 1874 <br />
Month Feb <br />
Day 15 <br />
Parents Surname HARPER <br />
Child Forenames Elizabeth Lucy Ann <br />
Fathers Forenames Thomas <br />
Mothers Forenames Elizabeth <br />
Mothers Surname  <br />
Residence Bream <br />
Occupation Haulier <br />
Officiating Minister J F Gosling <br />
Event Baptism <br />
Memoranda  <br />
Notes  <br />
Register Reference P57 IN 1/4 <br />
Page Number 17 <br />
Parish Chapel Bream </p>
<p>Perhaps also:<br />
Record ID 69332 <br />
Entry Number 459 <br />
Year 1876 <br />
Month Jul <br />
Day 9 <br />
Parents Surname HARPER <br />
Child Forenames George Thomas <br />
Fathers Forenames Thomas <br />
Mothers Forenames Elizabeth <br />
Mothers Surname  <br />
Residence Coleford Lane End <br />
Occupation Quarry Man <br />
Officiating Minister H L Perry Vicar <br />
Event Baptism <br />
Memoranda  <br />
Notes  <br />
Register Reference P88 IN 1/2 <br />
Page Number 58 <br />
Parish Chapel Clearwell </p>
<p>Record ID 69412 <br />
Entry Number 539 <br />
Year 1878 <br />
Month Sep <br />
Day 15 <br />
Parents Surname HARPER <br />
Child Forenames Lilian Annie <br />
Fathers Forenames Thomas <br />
Mothers Forenames Elizabeth <br />
Mothers Surname  <br />
Residence Lane End <br />
Occupation Quarry Man <br />
Officiating Minister H L Perry Vicar <br />
Event Baptism <br />
Memoranda  <br />
Notes  <br />
Register Reference P88 IN 1/2 <br />
Page Number 68 <br />
Parish Chapel Clearwell </p>
<p>I cannot find Thomas &amp; Elizabeth Sr's marriage on FoD, but from GlosBMD this &quot;fits&quot; the above births etc:</p>
<p>Groom Surname Groom Forename Bride Surname Bride Forename District Parish Building   Year Register Entry   <br />
HARPER Thomas JAMES Elizabeth Forest of Dean Monmouth Register Office   1870 8 7 </p>
<p>From FoD PRs this may be Thos Senior's premature burial, birthdate seems ok? :<br />
Record_ID: 10053 <br />
Entry_Number: 621 <br />
Year: 1897 <br />
Month: Jun <br />
Day: 27 <br />
Surname: HARPER <br />
Forenames: Thomas <br />
Residence: Clearwell <br />
Age_at_death: 52 <br />
Officiating_Minister: C Floddard <br />
Event: Burial <br />
Cause_of_death:  <br />
Memoranda:  <br />
Notes:  <br />
Register_Reference: P88 IN 1/7 <br />
Page_No: 79 <br />
Parish_Chapel: Clearwell <br />
Soundex: H616 </p>
<p>Suggesting his birth abt 1845.</p>
<p>From LDS here they are in 1881, except for young Thomas Morton ?!:</p>
<p>&quot;England and Wales Census, 1881,&quot; <br />
name: Thomas Harper  <br />
age: 35  <br />
gender: Male  <br />
birth year: 1846  <br />
birthplace: St Briavels, Gloucestershire, England  <br />
relationship to head of household: Head  <br />
marital condition: Married  <br />
profession/occupation: Stone Quarryman  <br />
address: ?  <br />
census place: West Dean (Gloucs), Monmouthshire, England  <br />
disability:  <br />
record type: Household  <br />
family history library film: 1342259  <br />
the national archives reference: RG11  <br />
piece/folio: 5225 / 37  <br />
page number: 8  <br />
Household Gender Age Birthplace <br />
head  Thomas Harper  M 35 St Briavels, Gloucestershire, England  <br />
wife  Elizabeth Harper  F 37 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England  <br />
son  George T Harper  M 5 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England  <br />
daughter  Lilian A Harper  F 3 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England </p>
<p>(So Thomas Sr was born abt 1846, St Braivels.  This site contains two possible  Baptisms for him in 1846, this most likely one plus one in Ruardean ?) </p>
<p>Record_ID: 73048 <br />
Entry_Number: 268 <br />
Year: 1846 <br />
Month: Jan <br />
Day: 12 <br />
Parents_Surname: HARPER <br />
Child_Forenames: Thomas <br />
Fathers_Forenames: Thomas <br />
Mothers_Forenames: Mary <br />
Mothers_Surname:  <br />
Residence: Stow <br />
Occupation: Farmer <br />
Officiating_Minister: J.J.Barlow <br />
Event: Baptism <br />
Memoranda:  <br />
Notes:  <br />
Register_Reference: P278 IN 1/6 <br />
Page_Number: 34 <br />
Parish_Chapel: St Briavels <br />
Soundex: H616 </p>
<p><br />
Back to the 1881 Census, this is the best fit I can find for stray Thomas Morton Harper b1871:</p>
<p>&quot;England and Wales Census, 1881,&quot; <br />
name: Thomas J Harper  <br />
age: 10  <br />
gender: Male  <br />
birth year: 1871  <br />
birthplace: West Dean, Gloucestershire, England  <br />
relationship to head of household: Grand Son  <br />
marital condition: Single  <br />
profession/occupation: Scholar  <br />
address: ?  <br />
census place: West Dean (Gloucs), Monmouthshire, England  <br />
disability:  <br />
record type: Household  <br />
family history library film: 1342259  <br />
the national archives reference: RG11  <br />
piece/folio: 5224 / 64  <br />
page number: 19  <br />
Household Gender Age Birthplace <br />
head  Ellen Lee  F 58 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England  <br />
boarder  Thersa Harper  F 28 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England  <br />
grand son  Thomas J Harper  M 10 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England  <br />
grand son  Albert E Harper  M 8 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England  <br />
son  Thomas Lee  M 10 West Dean, Gloucestershire, England</p>
<p>Why isn't Thos Morton with his parents ?. Is their house full ?<br />
Has he ALREADY committed his &quot;sin&quot; ?</p>
<p><br />
LATER UPDATE:<br />
OR have I just made an error with the non-user-friendly LDS system and the large numbers of Thos Harpers in the area, as Slowhands has pointed out. Ah well, possible new branches for the tree ? <br />
Sorry for any confusion,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38716</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38716</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>Jefff</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thomas Moreton Harper Free Miner (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas Moreton Harper was registered as a Free Miner on 29 August 1898. His age was declared as 27 years and he was given the registration number 2729.  At the time of his registration his address was Whippington Brook, Staunton.</p>
<p>Source:  FODLHS-MM1.  Roll of Honour  Mining &amp; Quarry Fatalities in The Forest of Dean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38714</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38714</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 19:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>Paul Andrews</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Harper Family (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1901 England Census</p>
<p>Yorkshire&gt;Rawmarsh&gt;District1<br />
RG13/4398; Folio:  5; Page:  1</p>
<p>11 Rotherham Rd, Rawmarsh</p>
<p>Thomams F Harper - Head - M - 29 - Coal Miner, road repairer below ground - Gloucester, Bream<br />
Eliza J Harper - Wife - M -29 -  Gloucester, Whitecroft</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38713</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38713</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 19:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>Paul Andrews</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Harper Family (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can see they were both 19 years of age at the time of their marriage in 1891 and aged 39 on the 1911 census + daughter aged 3.</p>
<p>There is on ancestry: Thomas Moreton Harper, born 1892, Monmouth</p>
<p><br />
No trace of this couple (so far 1901 census)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38712</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38712</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>m p griffiths</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Harper Family</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi </p>
<p>I'm currently looking into my father in laws family, the Harpers and utilising your excellent records have come across an anomoly. Thomas Moreton Harper is shown as having married Eliza Lucretia Williams in 1891 at Coleford. However, by 1911 Thomas is living in Bramley, near Rotherham. The 1911 Census shows him married to Eliza but that they have only been married for 6 years. My father in law understands that Thomas was a free-forester in the Forest of Dean, but believes he had this taken away from him due to some matter that the family have never disclosed. Do you know of anyway I could establish if there is any base to these rumours and if these are one and the same people. Any help/information would be appreciated. </p>
<p>As for the family tree, I've taken this back, so far, to the mid 1700's, including at least one family member who was a parish clerk in or around Ruradean. (Jonathan Harper).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38710</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=38710</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>unknown</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
