<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Forest of Dean FHT  Forum - William Adams 1826(?) - 1870</title>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/</link>
<description>Connecting Forest of Dean Researchers World-Wide </description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>William Adams 1826(?) - 1870 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've now found the first report of the committal of Eliza Cutter in the Monmouth Police Court. The report is from the Hereford Journal of 7th December 1842, and provides a little more information:</p>
<p><span style="font-size:smaller;">&quot;Eliza Taylor, apparently about forty years of age, and who possesses anything but a fascinating appearance, was charged with.............&quot;</span><br />
and<br />
<span style="font-size:smaller;">&quot;The bone of contention appears to be the management of a little property, vested in the female as trustee for two children, the offspring of a former marriage.&quot;<br />
</span><br />
Edward Jones did not appear at this hearing, and it's not apparent from the report, that George Taylor did either.</p>
<p>All other info, the census entries 1841 - 1881 and the register entry for her marriage to John Harris in 1857, would indicate that Eliza was around 30 years of age at the time, not 40.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45605</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45605</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>nigeldownunder</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>William Adams 1826(?) - 1870 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I don't know George's age, it's not apparent in the sparse documentation I have of him. He's described as &quot;of full age&quot; in the transcript of his wedding to Eliza in September 1842.<br />
I had found a possible burial:<br />
Record_ID: 88184<br />
Entry_Number: 12<br />
Year: 1843<br />
Month: Oct<br />
Day: 8<br />
Surname: TAYLOR<br />
Forenames: George<br />
Residence: Joyford<br />
Age_at_death: 53<br />
Officiating_Minister: T.R.Garnsey<br />
Event: Burial<br />
Cause_of_death: <br />
Memoranda: <br />
Notes: <br />
Register_Reference: P82 IN 1/13<br />
Page_No: 2<br />
Parish_Chapel: Christchurch<br />
 - but on reflection, this George is quite a lot older than Eliza, and anyway, the newspaper article referred to by Mike Pinchin in his recent posting would suggest that George didn't follow Eliza to Joyford after all, and either George was awol from Eliza, or Eliza was awol from George!<br />
It's unfortunate there's no corresponding inquest to this deathto give some more details.</p>
<p>I concede that the 1851 census notes Eliza as &quot;U&quot;nmarried, not &quot;W&quot;idowed - although it's clear that she had multiple marriages over time. Maybe in 1851 she just considered herself to be &quot;between&quot; marriages? I'm nevertheless convinced that this is our Eliza due to the presence of the three children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45604</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45604</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 06:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>nigeldownunder</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>William Adams 1826(?) - 1870 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike - I was unaware of this newspaper report, and it certainly throws the cat among the pigeons!<br />
I managed to find a report (on <a href="http://www.FindMyPast.co.uk">www.FindMyPast.co.uk</a>) in the Hereford Journal of 5th April, which goes into greater detail of the case, and seems to portray Eliza in a somewhat more sympathetic light:</p>
<p><span style="font-size:smaller;">HEREFORDSHIRE SPRING ASSIZEZ, 1843<br />
TRIAL OF PRISONERS (before Sir Wm. Wightman) -Thursday, March 30</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:smaller;">CURIOUS CHARGE OF BIGAMY.- Eliza Taylor was charged with bigamy, she having married, on the 24th September, 1842, at the parish of Penalt, in the county of Monmouthshire, George Taylor, and also having married on the following 1st of November, 1842, at the parish of Welsh Newton, in the county of Hereford, Edward Jones; her former husband, Geo. Taylor, being then living. Mr Smithy, on behalf of the prosecutor, called Francis Crossman, constable, who stated that he went to Penalt church, and examined a certificate, from which he took a copy; he also went to Welsh Newton, and took a copy; afterwards apprehended the prisoner on the 18th of November at Whitchurch, on the charge of bigamy. It appearing that the witness could not prove that the copies he had taken were exactly similar to those in the register books, his lordship refused to admit them as evidence, and stated that he should not allow the attorney his expenses. - James Reynolds, parish clerk of Penalt, was next examined. He remembered the prisoner being married to George Taylor on the 24th of September, and that the banns were regularly published; the prisoner gave her name as Eliza Cutter, widow. - The witness was cross-examined by Mr. Skinner. He stated that he did not know Jones, nor did he know Taylor before the day of the marriage. - James Silvester, clerk of Welsh Newton, deposed that on the 1st of November Edward Jones was married to Eliza Cutter, as a widow, by banns, which were duly published. - Cross-examined: Did not know the prisoner before that time, neither did he know Jones before he brought the banns to him (witness) to have them published; knew well that George Taylor was living at the time the prisoner was apprehended. - By the Judge: Had known George Taylor eight or ten years; heard him accuse the prisoner at Monmouth before the magistrates, of being married to him before she was to Jones, but would not swear to the exact words uttered upon that occasion. - Mr Skinner addressed the jury on behalf of the prisoner, after which his lordship summed up in a very clear manner, observing that the present case was a very singular one, inasmuch as it appeared that only six weeks had elapsed from the prisoner's marriage with Taylor to the time of her being married to Jones; that the principal portion of the testimony rested on a person named Taylor, who charged the prisoner with being his wife, but that the person was not in court, and that the great point was whether there was not a mistake as to the identity of the prisoner. - The jury, after a short consultation, returned a verdict of Not Guilty. - The prisoner, who appeared to belong to the humbler class, but was respectably dressed, had been admitted to bail; what makes the case more singular is, that only three weeks could have elapsed between the first marriage and the publishing the banns (sic) for the other.<br />
</span></p>
<p>Was Eliza a scheming manipulator? A wronged woman who felt she had no choice? An unfortunate victim of circumstances beyond her control? Or was this a genuine case of mistaken identity?</p>
<p>It's interesting to note the difference in tone between the Hereford Journal report, and that of the Gloucester Journal. The former makes no mention of Eliza's age, so can we rely on the &quot;38&quot; stated in the latter?</p>
<p>Certainly the LDS transcript of the marriage of Edward Jones and Eliza Cutter looks convincing (it's almost as if she's convinced the marriage to George Taylor never happened!) - it's a shame that the bride's father's occupation isn't stated. William Jones was a bargeman in Eliza's marriage to George Taylor (1842) and to John Harris (1857). Maybe the occupation is noted in the parish register, but wasn't transcribed by LDS? (Their transcriptions seem sometimes to concentrate on what they consider to be important, and to sometimes ignore &quot;ancillary&quot; information.) </p>
<p>In Eliza's marriage to John Harris, she states her name to be Eliza Taylor, effectively discounting her marriage to Edward Jones. <br />
The validity of this marriage is certainly questionable. The rule of Double Jeopardy would prevent Eliza from being re-tried for bigamy, so presumably either Edward Jones had died by this time, or his marriage to Eliza had been annulled in some way because of the pre-existing marriage to George Taylor. </p>
<p>I've done a quick search in <a href="http://www.welshnewspapers.llgc.org.uk">www.welshnewspapers.llgc.org.uk</a> to see if I could find a report of George's apparent appearance before the magistrate in Monmouth accusing Eliza of bigamy - without success.</p>
<p>I agree that the parentage of the Taylor children is now brought into question. Maybe they were born out of wedlock, and merely took on Eliza's name of TAYLOR. (Although why she retained the surname Taylor, and didn't use JONES, is something I suppose we'll never know.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45603</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45603</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 05:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>nigeldownunder</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>William Adams 1826(?) - 1870 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This extract from the BNA contains some interesting information:-</p>
<p>Gloucester Journal – Saturday 08 April 1843</p>
<p>HEREFORD, March 30 – Eliza TAYLOR, aged 38, was charged with having married one Edward JONES, at the Parish of Welsh Newton, in this county, her former husband, George TAYLOR, being at the time alive. It appeared from the evidence of the parish clerk of Penalt, in the adjoining county of Monmouth, that the prisoner was married in the church of that parish on the 24th September 1842, to George TAYLOR. For some reason, which the learned counsel for the prosecution did not state, and which did not clearly transpire, she, shortly after her marriage, conceived an aversion for him whose fate and fortunes she had solemnly undertaken to share; and thinking that a few weeks’ trial of the partner of her bed was sufficient to enable her to form an accurate opinion of his merits, she, on the 1st November, united herself in wedlock to another fortunate swain, the above-named Edward JONES and took up her abode under the roof of her newly-acquired husband………………….</p>
<p><em>[She appears to have been acquitted on the technicality that her former husband’s name was not included on the indictment such that the jury might be satisfied of his being alive at the time of the alleged intermarriage.]<br />
</em><br />
LDS records this marriage but does not have the bride’s age. However, her father’s name matches.</p>
<p>Name:  Edward Jones<br />
Birth Date:  1812<br />
Age:  30<br />
Spouse's Name:  Eliza Cutter<br />
Event Date:  01 Nov 1842<br />
Event Place:  Welsh Newton, Hereford, England<br />
Father's Name:  John Jones<br />
Spouse's Father's Name:  William Jones<br />
Indexing Project (Batch) Number: I04583-1 , System Origin: England-EASy , GS Film number: 1594778 Reference ID: item 3 p 5</p>
<p>This all seems too much to be coincidence even though the age in the report is apparently out by 10 years. But what about the two TAYLOR children?  And what about the validity of the marriage to John HARRIS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45600</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45600</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>Mike Pinchin</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>William Adams 1826(?) - 1870 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hi there Mike - you've really been doing some homework!<br />
I had found all of these entries, bar the last one.<br />
I looked at the image of the 1851 census for Eliza Taylor/Cutter, and in my opinion the form seems to describe her as a &quot;W&quot;idow, notwithstanding the transcription that says she's unmarried. In fact, poor old Eliza was married 3 times, firstly to John Cutter as we already know, then to George Taylor, whom she married on 24th September 1842, a year after John Cutter's death at age 29:</p>
</blockquote><p>Hi Nigel, <br />
on reading your post I thought I'd try and find George's burial before the 1851 Census, sadly not a rare name at all but I cannot see an obvious (ie local) candidate in the PRs. That said, I don't know his age, don't think it's mentioned in this thread, do you know it please ?. I couldn't easily find him in the Census etc, </p>
<p>However, viewing the 1851 Census for Eliza, without wishing to appear &quot;picky&quot; I must say I disagree with your interpretation of the Census regarding what looks like a &quot;U&quot; crossed with a &quot;W&quot;  next to Eliza. Admittedly it's part-obscured by an enumerator's mark, but to me it clearly appears to be the same &quot;U = unmarried&quot; mark as has been used many times through these census pages. I did wonder if it was a ditto mark, but no judging from the rest of the pages.</p>
<p>Helpfully, a few entries above Eliza is William Jones age 72 who is described as &quot;Widw&quot;, for &quot;widow&quot;, and is indeed living with another lady who's clearly not his wife. <br />
Unfortunately and in typical fashion for me! I didn't see this entry until after I'd browsed thro the Census pages AFTER Eliza's entry, looking for a &quot;widow&quot;, until I reached the base of page 10, where this word is again used against William Davis, aged 61, head of a house with his daughters but no wife.</p>
<p>So, in this instance it seems to be a correctly-transcribed Census by a conscientious enumerator, and I wonder if George has really died, but just gone awol, or working away etc ?</p>
<p><a href="http://interactive.ancestry.co.uk/8860/MONHO107_2444_2444-0627/16766254?backurl=http%3a%2f%2fsearch.ancestry.co.uk%2f%2fcgi-bin%2fsse.dll%3frank%3d1%26new%3d1%26MSAV%3d1%26gss%3dangs-c%26gsfn%3deliza%26gsln%3dtaylor%26msbdy%3d1813%26msypn__ftp%3dPenalt%252c%2bHerefordshire%252c%2bEngland%26msypn%3d1666554%26msypn_PInfo%3d8-%257c0%257c0%257c3257%257c3251%257c0%257c0%257c0%257c5267%257c1666554%257c0%257c%26cpxt%3d1%26uidh%3ddv7%26cp%3d11%26pcat%3dCEN_1850%26h%3d16766254%26recoff%3d6%2b7%26db%3duki1851%26indiv%3d1%26ml_rpos%3d1&amp;ssrc=&amp;backlabel=ReturnRecord#?imageId=MONHO107_2444_2444-0627">http://interactive.ancestry.co.uk/8860/MONHO107_2444_2444-0627/16766254?backurl=http%3a...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45598</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45598</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>Jefff</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>William Adams 1826(?) - 1870 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>???  </p>
<p><br />
1841 Census Dean Forest  - Pillowell</p>
<p>Alice THOMAS - 65     +<br />
John HAMPTON 25<br />
Sarah HAMPTON 25<br />
Alice 3<br />
William ADAMS, 21 Ag Lab  +</p>
<p><br />
1851 Census Pillowell</p>
<p>Alice THOMAS - 80 born Lydney<br />
Jno HAMPTON - 39 - son-in-law - Nailer born Little Dean<br />
Sarah HAMPTON - 43 - born West Dean<br />
Alice HAMPTON - 12</p>
<p>---</p>
<p><br />
John HAMPTON married Sarah THOMAS 1838 - not sure what the plus sign means in the end column</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45588</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45588</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>MPGriffiths</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>William Adams 1826(?) - 1870 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there Mike - you've really been doing some homework!<br />
I had found all of these entries, bar the last one.<br />
I looked at the image of the 1851 census for Eliza Taylor/Cutter, and in my opinion the form seems to describe her as a &quot;W&quot;idow, notwithstanding the transcription that says she's unmarried. In fact, poor old Eliza was married 3 times, firstly to John Cutter as we already know, then to George Taylor, whom she married on 24th September 1842, a year after John Cutter's death at age 29:</p>
<p>Record ID: 41227 Entry Number: <br />
Year: 1842 Month: Sep Day: 24 <br />
Grooms Surname: TAYLOR Grooms Forenames: George <br />
Grooms Age: full, Groom Condition: bachelor <br />
Grooms Occupation: woodcutter, Grooms Residence: Penallt <br />
Grooms Fathers Surname: Taylor, Grooms Fathers Forenames: John, Grooms Fathers Occupation: woodcutter <br />
Brides Surname: CUTLER Brides Forenames: Eliza <br />
Brides Age: full, Brides Condition: widow, Brides Residence: Penallt <br />
Brides Fathers Surname: Jones, Brides Fathers Forenames: William, Brides Fathers Occupation: bargeman <br />
Licence or Banns: banns <br />
Signature or Mark: Both mark <br />
Witness 1: James Reynolds <br />
Witness 2: Margaret Miles <br />
Event: Marriage <br />
Register Reference: not given.Page Number: not given. Parish Chapel: Penallt Monmouth </p>
<p>I don't know when George died, but he must have died after Sarah Ann's birth, but before Eliza married John Harris in 1857.</p>
<p>Sarah Ann took to calling herself Margaret Taylor after she got married, and her marriage entry sort of explains this:<br />
Record_ID: 2402 <br />
Entry_Number: 177 <br />
Year: 1865 <br />
Month: Dec <br />
Day: 24 <br />
Grooms_Surname: EVANS <br />
Grooms_Forenames: Peter <br />
Grooms_Age: 20 <br />
Groom_Condition: Widower <br />
Grooms_Occupation: Collier <br />
Grooms_Residence: Joyford <br />
Grooms_Fathers_Surname: Evans <br />
Grooms_Fathers_Forenames: Thomas <br />
Grooms_Fathers_Occupation: Collier <br />
Brides_Surname: TAYLOR <br />
Brides_Forenames: Sarah Ann Margaret <br />
Brides_Age: 19 <br />
Brides_Condition: Spinster <br />
Brides_Occupation: [not stated] <br />
Brides_Residence: Joyford <br />
Brides_Fathers_Surname: Taylor <br />
Brides_Fathers_Forenames: George <br />
Brides_Fathers_Occupation: Woodcutter <br />
Licence_or_Banns: Banns <br />
Date_of_Banns:  <br />
Signature_or_Mark: Both mark <br />
Witness_1: Wm Adams <br />
Witness_2: Mary Ann Berry <br />
Other_Witnesses: None <br />
Officiating_Minister: W. H. Taylor <br />
Event: Marriage <br />
Memoranda: - <br />
Notes: - <br />
Register_Reference: PFC82 IN 1/7 <br />
Page_Number: 89 <br />
Parish_Chapel: Christchurch </p>
<p>Peter and Margaret Evans are buried in Christchurch </p>
<p>record_id 476 <br />
Location Row M <br />
Reference Number 170 <br />
Type Double Kerb with urn <br />
Surname EVANS <br />
First Name Peter <br />
Day 18 <br />
Month Oct <br />
Year 1910 <br />
Age 65 <br />
Details In loving memory of Peter Evans died Oct 18 1910 aged 65 years Also of Margaret his wife died feb 25 1934 aged 87 years <br />
Notes  <br />
Parish Christchurch</p>
<p>This Margaret Evans is almost certainly the Sarah Ann Margaret Taylor who married Peter Evans. She can be found in the 1911 census as a widow, but filled in the line about live births etc, and it all ties in:<br />
 RG14; Piece: 31730; Schedule Number: 91.<br />
MARGARAT EVANS, head, 64, widow, (married 45 years, 8 children born alive, 7 children still living), born Glos West Dean<br />
ELIZABETH EVANS, daughter, 28, single, general domestic, at home, born Glos West Dean<br />
GEORGE ADAMS, (nephew)/boarder, 49, batchelor, farm labourer, worker, born Glos West Dean</p>
<p>And yes, we have the ADAMS connection yet again! This is my G-Grandfather's brother.</p>
<p>I didn't know about this MI last year when I visited UK, otherwise I would have taken a photo of the headstone for my collection......</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45587</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45587</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 11:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>nigeldownunder</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>William Adams 1826(?) - 1870 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m sure you must have a lot of this but to satisfy my own curiosity,</p>
<p>GR 1841 Census, Extra Parochial, Joyford, Nr Coalfrd,</p>
<p>John CUTTER, 29, Coal Miner, born in county<br />
Eliza, 28, born in county<br />
Elen, 21, Independent, born in county<br />
Mary Ann, 4, born in county<br />
Elizabeth, 1, born in county</p>
<p>The marriage from this site,</p>
<p>Record_ID: 27064<br />
Entry_Number: 295<br />
Year: 1834<br />
Month: Feb<br />
Day: 10<br />
Grooms_Surname: CUTTER<br />
Grooms_Forenames: John<br />
Grooms_Age: <br />
Groom_Condition: Bachelor<br />
Grooms_Occupation: <br />
Grooms_Residence: Hundred of St Briavels<br />
Grooms_Fathers_Surname: <br />
Grooms_Fathers_Forenames: <br />
Grooms_Fathers_Occupation: <br />
Brides_Surname: JONES<br />
Brides_Forenames: Eliza<br />
Brides_Age: <br />
Brides_Condition: Spinster<br />
Brides_Occupation: <br />
Brides_Residence: Hundred of St Briavels<br />
Brides_Fathers_Surname: <br />
Brides_Fathers_Forenames: <br />
Brides_Fathers_Occupation: <br />
Licence_or_Banns: Banns<br />
Date_of_Banns: <br />
Signature_or_Mark: Both mark<br />
Witness_1: Henry Grindell<br />
Witness_2: Elizabeth Bozley<br />
Other_Witnesses: <br />
Officiating_Minister: Yate Fosbroke Curate<br />
Event: Marriage<br />
Memoranda: <br />
Notes: <br />
Register_Reference: P278 IN 1/10<br />
Page_Number: 99<br />
Parish_Chapel: St Briavels</p>
<p>The death of John CUTTER from this site,</p>
<p>Record_ID: 60173<br />
Entry_Number: 3778</p>
<p>Year: 1841<br />
Month: Sep<br />
Day: 23<br />
Surname: CUTTER<br />
Forenames: John<br />
Residence: Joyford<br />
Age_at_death: 29<br />
Officiating_Minister: T.R. Garnsey<br />
Event: Burial<br />
Cause_of_death: <br />
Memoranda: <br />
Notes: <br />
Register_Reference: P82 IN 1/1<br />
Page_No: 49<br />
Parish_Chapel: Christchurch</p>
<p>Eliza's baptism?</p>
<p>Record_ID: 387238<br />
Entry_Number: <br />
Year: 1812<br />
Month: Nov<br />
Day: 22<br />
Parents_Surname: JONES<br />
Child_Forenames: Eliza<br />
Fathers_Forenames: William<br />
Mothers_Forenames: Ann<br />
Mothers_Surname: <br />
Residence: <br />
Occupation: <br />
Officiating_Minister: <br />
Event: Baptism<br />
Memoranda: <br />
Notes: Indexed using transcribed notes.<br />
Register_Reference: B39/1<br />
Page_Number: <br />
Parish_Chapel: Whitchurch</p>
<p>Eliza CUTTER takes the name TAYLOR and has at least one more child (probably two),</p>
<p>GR 1851 Census, Joyford,</p>
<p>Eliza TAYLOR, Head, Un, 38, Labouring Woman, Herefordshire, Goodrich<br />
Mary Ann CUTTER, Daur, U, 13, Scholar, West Dean<br />
Elizabeth CUTTER, Daur, 11, Scholar, West Dean<br />
Sarah Ann TAYLOR, Daur,4, Scholar, West Dean</p>
<p>Sarah Ann TAYLOR's baptism from this site ( Mary Ann and Elizabeth are also here as I'm sure you know,</p>
<p>Record_ID: 333402<br />
Entry_Number: <br />
Year: 1846<br />
Month: Jul<br />
Day: 21<br />
Parents_Surname: TAYLER<br />
Child_Forenames: Sarah Ann<br />
Fathers_Forenames: [not stated]<br />
Mothers_Forenames: Eliza<br />
Mothers_Surname: <br />
Residence: of West Dean<br />
Occupation: <br />
Officiating_Minister: <br />
Event: Baptism<br />
Memoranda: Born 1 Jul 1846<br />
Notes: <br />
Register_Reference: RG4/772<br />
Page_Number: <br />
Parish_Chapel: Coleford Wesleyan</p>
<p><br />
Eliza marries John  HARRIS,</p>
<p>GR 1861 Census,</p>
<p>John HARRIS, Head, Mar, 40, Coal Miner, Glos. W. Dean<br />
Eliza, Wife, Mar, 48, Heref. Goodrich<br />
Elizabeth CUTTER, Dau, Un, 21, Glos. W. Dean<br />
Margrett TAYLOR, Dau, 14, Scholar, Glos. W. Dean<br />
William H. TAYLOR, Son, 6, Schlolar, Glos. W. Dean</p>
<p>Record_ID: 4227<br />
Entry_Number: 184<br />
Year: 1857<br />
Month: Apl<br />
Day: 19<br />
Grooms_Surname: HARRIS<br />
Grooms_Forenames: John<br />
Grooms_Age: 35<br />
Groom_Condition: Bachelor<br />
Grooms_Occupation: Labourer<br />
Grooms_Residence: Lea Bailey<br />
Grooms_Fathers_Surname: Harris<br />
Grooms_Fathers_Forenames: William<br />
Grooms_Fathers_Occupation: Labourer<br />
Brides_Surname: TAYLOR<br />
Brides_Forenames: Eliza<br />
Brides_Age: 44<br />
Brides_Condition: Spinster<br />
Brides_Occupation: <br />
Brides_Residence: Lea Bailey<br />
Brides_Fathers_Surname: Jones<br />
Brides_Fathers_Forenames: William<br />
Brides_Fathers_Occupation: Bargeman<br />
Licence_or_Banns: Banns<br />
Date_of_Banns: <br />
Signature_or_Mark: Both Mark<br />
Witness_1: John Morgan<br />
Witness_2: Ann Morgan<br />
Other_Witnesses: <br />
Officiating_Minister: W. Thornton<br />
Event: Marriage<br />
Memoranda: <br />
Notes: <br />
Register_Reference: P109 IN 1/6<br />
Page_Number: 92<br />
Parish_Chapel: Drybrook</p>
<p>GR 1871 Census, West Dean, Joyford</p>
<p>John HARRIS, Head, Mar, 48, Coal Miner, Glos. W. Dean<br />
Eliza, Wife, Mar, 57, Heref. Goodrich<br />
William Henry TAYLOR, Lodger, Un, 16, Glos. W. Dean</p>
<p>The ADAMS connexion appears,</p>
<p><br />
GR 1881 Census, West Dean, Joyford</p>
<p>John HARRIS, Head, Mar, 60, Ag. Lab., West Dean Glos.<br />
Eliza, Wife, Mar, 67, Goodrich, Heref.<br />
George ADAMS, Grandson, Un, 18, Coal Miner, W. Dean, Glos.<br />
William H. ADAMS, Grandson, 13, Scolar, W. Dean, Glos.</p>
<p>GR 1891 Census, W. Dean, Joyford,</p>
<p>Elizabeth ADAMS, Head, Mar, 51, Charwoman, Glos. Joyford<br />
William H., Son, S, 23, Coal Miner, Glos, E. Bicknor<br />
Elizabeth, Dau, S, 20, Charwoman, Glos. Joyford<br />
John HARRIS, Lodger, Widr, 70, Ag lab, Glos Joyford</p>
<p>Both the William ADAMS’s  born in East Dean don’t seem to be candidates. However, there is this one in West Dean:-</p>
<p>GR 1851 Census,</p>
<p>Charles DAVISON, Head, Mar, 47, Wood cutter, Glos. Staunton<br />
Sarah, Wife, Mar, 50, Glos. Bicknor<br />
Samuel, Son, un, 27, Shoemaker &amp; Master,  Glos. Staunton<br />
William ADAMS, Visitor, Un, 28, Sawyer &amp; Journeyman, b. Not Known.</p>
<p>The only recommendation of this William ADAMS is that he was in the right area at not too far off the right time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45586</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45586</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2015 20:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>Mike Pinchin</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>William Adams 1826(?) - 1870 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that - it certainly looks like neither John and Mary, nor William and Margaret, are &quot;my&quot; William Adams parents. I'll have to keep looking, but for now my Adams line remains a mystery beyond about 1826. <br />
I'm still waiting for William's death certificate in the vain hope it will provide a further clue.</p>
<p>Again, many thanks for your input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45584</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45584</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2015 06:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>nigeldownunder</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>William Adams 1826(?) - 1870 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Ancestry now have the original certificate to view</p>
<p>William<strong> Marman</strong> ADAMS - full age, bachelor - father John ADAMS - <strong>Stone Cutter[</strong>/b]<br />
married Deborah WIGMORE at Gloucester St Mary de Lobe - 13 December 1859 </p>
<p>witnesses: James TURNER and May NASH?</p>
<p>Baptism at Blakeney</p>
<p>May 16 1824, </p>
<p>Christian Names: William Adams <strong>Marmont </strong>- son of<br />
John  (<strong>Quarryman</strong>) and Mary<br />
<strong>Surname: Adams</strong><br />
residence: Forest of Dean - </p>
<p><br />
-  His baptism is as transcribed on the Forest of Dean records.</p>
<p><br />
1871 Census, Stroud, Gloucestreshire</p>
<p>William ADAMS - 44 - Quarryman, born Blakeney, Glos<br />
Deborah - 42 - born Minchinhampton, Gloucs<br />
Maria - 10 - born Blakeney</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45509</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45509</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2015 14:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>MPGriffiths</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>William Adams 1826(?) - 1870 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William Addams in the 1861 census is lodging with the DREW family in Monmouth, and his fellow lodgers are John Berry and Mary A Berry.</p>
<p>JOHN DREW, head, married, 55, victualler, born Glostershire Dursley<br />
ANN DREW, wife, married, 55, born Monmouth<br />
ELIZA A DREW, daur, unmarried, 20, dressmaker, born Monmouth<br />
ANN E DREW, daur, unmarried, 18, dressmaker, born Monmouth<br />
JOHN BERRY, lodger, married, 26, labourer, born Monmouth<br />
MARY A BERRY, lodger, married, 22, born Glostershire Joyford<br />
WILLIAM ADDAMS, lodger, unmarried, 36, labourer, born Glostershire Joyford</p>
<p>At first I thought this was not helpful in finding out more about &quot;my&quot; William Adams, but on closer examination, his fellow lodgers are John Berry and Mary A Berry - who just happen to be the witnesses at &quot;my&quot; William's marriage to Elizabeth Cutter:</p>
<p>Copy of marriage certificate, Monmouthshire vol 11a page 70 - application number 6223314/1.<br />
Marriage solemnized at Dorward Chapel Whitchurch in the District of Monmouth 5th August 1862<br />
WILLIAM ADAMS, 37 years, bachelor, labourer, Residence: Monmouth, Father: Jonathan Adams, labourer<br />
ELIZABETH CUTTER, 23 years, spinster, Residence: Berry Hill West Dean, Father: John Cutter, collier<br />
Married at Dorward Chapel according to the rites of the: Independents, in the presence of: JOHN BERRY (mark), MARY ANN BERRY.</p>
<p>AND, it turns out that Mary A Berry is none other than William Adams' wife's sister, Mary Ann Cutter:</p>
<p>Record ID: 107918 Entry Number:<br />
Year: 1856 Month: Nov Day: 9<br />
Grooms Surname: BERRY Grooms Forenames: John<br />
Groom Condition: bachelor, Grooms Occupation: horse keeper, Grooms Residence: of this parish<br />
Grooms Fathers Surname: Berry Grooms Fathers Forenames: John, Grooms Fathers Occupation: nailer<br />
Brides Surname: CUTTER Brides Forenames: Mary Ann<br />
Brides Age: 19<br />
Brides Condition: spinster, Brides Residence: of this parish<br />
Brides Fathers Surname: Cutter, Brides Fathers Forenames: John, Brides Fathers Occupation: collier<br />
Signature or Mark: He marks she signs<br />
Witness 1: Wm Powles, Witness 2: Harriet Uptill<br />
Event: Marriage<br />
Parish Chapel: Monmouth. </p>
<p>Furthermore, John Berry's parents, John and Mary Berry, are recorded on the same page in the 1861 census:</p>
<p>JOHN BERRY, head, married, 52, nail harier(sic), born Monmouth<br />
MARY BERRY, wife, married, 55, born Monmouth<br />
THOMAS BERRY, son, unmarried, 18, labourer, born Monmouth</p>
<p>All these &quot;coincidences&quot; seemed too much to ignore, and they all point towards the William Adams who married Elizabeth Cutter, being the same William Addams in the 1861 census. I can only ascribe the difference in spelling of the surname to the enumerator. In fact, closer scrutiny of the census page shows the name could well be &quot;Aadams&quot;...............even more likely to be an enumerator error.</p>
<p>So that's how I linked the William Addams of the 1861 census to &quot;my&quot; William Adams, who married Elizabeth Cutter in 1862..</p>
<p>I have now seen the image of the Blakeney Parish Baptism records for William Adams Marmont ADAMS 16th May 1824, parents John and Mary Adams, and this confirms the transcription on FoDFHT. I can't be certain that this is &quot;my&quot; William, it just seems highly likely, although I can find NO other record or mention of the name MARMONT, and why the surname Adams was repeated as a forename, escapes me. <br />
I have marked this down as a probable/possible, but I'll need a bit more evidence before I bring John and Mary's family definitively into my tree.</p>
<p>If it were easy, it wouldn't be so much fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45508</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45508</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2015 10:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>nigeldownunder</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>William Adams 1826(?) - 1870 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A trawl of GFHS Baptism Index gives this which seems to match the 1851 Census entries,</p>
<p>Parents John and Mary ADAMS,</p>
<p>Thomas, bap. 02/08/1822; Residence – FoD; Parish - Blakeney All Saints<br />
William, 16/05/1824; FoD; Blakeney All Saints<br />
George, 19/03/1826; FoD; Blakeney All Saints<br />
Emily, 09/03/1828; FoD; Blakeney All Saints<br />
Mary Ann, 26/09/1830; FoD; Blakeney All Saints<br />
Robert, 01/12/1833; Old Furnace; Blakeney All Saints</p>
<p>Parents William and Margaret ADAMS,</p>
<p>Henry, 10/08/1823; FoD; Blakeney All Saints<br />
William, 19/12/1824; FoD; Blakeney All Saints<br />
Joseph (1827) <em>[apparently not in GFHS]</em><br />
Caroline, 15/06/1828; FoD; Blakeney All Saints</p>
<p>These seem to be the only John/Mary and William/Caroline combinations listed.</p>
<p>In the 1841 Census both families seem to be located at Old Furnace.</p>
<p>The William in the first family is marked in GFHS with forenames William Adams M.</p>
<p>I was wondering how you associated this with the William ADDAMS from the 1861 Census, born Glostershire , Joyford. He does not seem to be listed in GFHS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45506</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45506</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2015 01:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>Mike Pinchin</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>William Adams 1826(?) - 1870 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your response.<br />
Of the two possible families for William Adams from the 1851 census, I had already pretty much ruled out the second one, MARGREAT (sic) ADAMS, as I had found the family, including Margaret's husband WILLIAM, in the 1841 census.<br />
I was certainly leaning towards the first family, that of John and Mary Adams. It doesn't require much of a stretch to go from John to Jonathan, as found on &quot;my&quot; William's marriage certificate. I'll obviously have to investigate this further.</p>
<p>I had noted the ADAMS family entry before Elizabeth ADAMS on the 1871 census, that of George and Emma Adams, but can't as yet find any link between the two families. </p>
<p>I've looked at the public trees on Ancestry, but I find many of those trees unreliable, and use them as research pointers only. I remember some years ago, on one of my now-defunct public trees, I made a couple of heroic (and unrealistic) assumptions - and within days the same mistakes started popping up on numerous trees, where people had blindly taken my &quot;information&quot; as gospel truth!</p>
<p>My next step is to get hold of &quot;my&quot; WILLIAM ADAMS' death certificate (already ordered, but can take weeks to get out here to Far North Queensland)- this will, I hope, confirm that he is the WA who was buried at English Bicknor on 2nd March 1870.</p>
<p>I also want to verify the baptism entry that is transcribed on FoDFHT for WILLIAM ADAMS MARMONT ADAMS on 16th May 1824. Parents are John and Mary, but I suspect a transcription error on the child's forenames. Do you know where the original documents that were transcribed, are held?</p>
<p>Small steps I know. We can't always have &quot;Eureka&quot; moments!!</p>
<p>Cheers for now, and thanks again for your input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45501</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45501</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 03:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>nigeldownunder</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>William Adams 1826(?) - 1870 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mike for your response.<br />
I had seen the baptism transcript for 1873 on FoDFHT, but hadn't gotten around to confirming this was &quot;my&quot; Elizabeth, mainly because of the 2 year gap between birth and baptism (most, but by no means all baptisms tend to happen within a month or so of birth). I was not aware of the birth entry on Glos BMD omitting the father's name, so if you put the two &quot;facts&quot; together, it certainly points towards the mother Elizabeth being over-enthusiastically consoled by someone after the death of her husband! I have traced her (the mother) through to the 1901 census, and she hadn't remarried by then, so there's no clue there.</p>
<p>When Elizabeth (the daughter) got married, on 20th February 1897, her father is noted as &quot;WILLIAM ADAMS, deceased&quot;, but that in itself is not conclusive - if she were in fact conceived while her mother was recently widowed, she would hardly want to advertise the fact!!<br />
Record ID: 2625 Entry Number: 401 <br />
Year: 1897 Month: Feb Day: 20 <br />
Grooms Surname: BODY <br />
Grooms Forenames: William John <br />
Grooms Age: 29 <br />
Groom Condition: Bachelor <br />
Grooms Occupation: Furnisher <br />
Grooms Residence: Llangenny <br />
Grooms Fathers Surname: Body <br />
Grooms Fathers Forenames: William <br />
Grooms Fathers Occupation: Paper Maker <br />
Brides Surname: ADAMS <br />
Brides Forenames: Elizabeth <br />
Brides Age: 25 <br />
Brides Condition: Spinster <br />
Brides Occupation: [not stated] <br />
Brides Residence: Joyford <br />
Brides Fathers Surname: Adams <br />
Brides Fathers Forenames: William <br />
Brides Fathers Occupation: deceased <br />
Licence or Banns: Banns <br />
Date of Banns: <br />
Signature or Mark: Both sign <br />
Witness 1: William Henry Adams <br />
Witness 2: Mary Ann Boddy <br />
Other Witnesses: None <br />
Officiating Minister: C. Barnes Vicar <br />
Event: Marriage <br />
Memoranda: - <br />
Notes: Groom signs surname as BODDY. Also appears in 1901 Census as BODDY <br />
Register Reference: PFC82 IN 1/7 Page Number: 201 Parish Chapel: Christchurch </p>
<p>(This is definitely &quot;my&quot; Elizabeth - her brother, William Henry Adams, my G-Grandfather, is a witness).</p>
<p>I guess the next logical step will be for me to get hold of William Adams death certificate, to see if that will confirm that he is the William Adams who was buried at English Bicknor on 2nd March 1870...........</p>
<p>I suppose it would be too much to expect there to have been a headstone, and for it to have survived to today!!</p>
<p>Many thanks again for your input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45500</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45500</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 01:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>nigeldownunder</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>William Adams 1826(?) - 1870 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might relate to Elizabeth (born 1871),</p>
<p>From Glos BMD</p>
<p>Child Surname Child Forename Father Surname Mother Surname Mother's Former Name Year District Office Register Entry   <br />
ADAMS Elizabeth  <em>[none]</em>   ADAMS CUTTER 1871 Forest of Dean Monmouth, Coleford 27 272</p>
<p>And then from this site,</p>
<p>Record_ID 151831<br />
Entry_Number 419<br />
Year 1873<br />
Month Mar<br />
Day 6<br />
Parents_Surname ADAMS<br />
Child_Forenames Elizabeth<br />
Fathers_Forenames [not stated]<br />
Mothers_Forenames Elizabeth<br />
Mothers_Surname <br />
Residence Shortstanding<br />
Occupation [not stated]<br />
Officiating_Minister W.H. Taylor<br />
Event Baptism<br />
Memoranda <br />
Notes <br />
Register_Reference PFC82 IN 1/4<br />
Page_Number 53<br />
Parish_Chapel Christchurch</p>
<p>No father’s name is given in either case. If William ADAMS had been the father would this not have been stated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45499</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45499</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>Mike Pinchin</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>William Adams 1826(?) - 1870 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By using the Advance Search : the second 1851 census quoted with Margreat ADAMS and her family - the father's name was William and he was a Quarryman.</p>
<p>Two marriages on Fod Records</p>
<p>1822  William ADAMS - residence, Forest of Dean, married Margaret LOWE - Forest of Desn - at Awre (one witness was a John ADAMS)<br />
1826 William ADAMS - residence, Mitchel Troy, married Margaret Ann LUCAS of this Parish at Monmouth</p>
<p>-----</p>
<p>1841 census, Newnham, Glos, Old Furnace</p>
<p>ADAMS</p>
<p>John - 40 - Quarryman - all born in County<br />
Mary - 40<br />
Thomas - 20 - Shoem<br />
William - 15 - lab  ***<br />
George - 14<br />
Emily - 12<br />
Mary - 10<br />
Robert - 7  (Robert Waters ADAMS - fod records)</p>
<p>John ADAMS married Mary WATERS at Awre 25 September 1821)</p>
<p>----<br />
?  There is a marriage at Dixton - 9 September 1860 for a Samuel ADAMS - residence, Buckholt, father: Jonathan ADAMS a labourer - and Susan HUNT</p>
<p><br />
--</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>I don't think this is your William either - as on the 1851 census aged 26 - he is a Quarryman and was christened in Blakeney.</p>
<p>Looking at Freebdm/Gloucestershirebdm - William  Marman ADAMS married Deborah WIGMORE in 1859 Gloucester District/St Mary de Lobe -  and Jessie Maria ADAMS registered 1860.</p>
<p>This family are on the 1871 census for Stroud, Gloucetershire, and William is a Quarrman as was his father John ADAMS</p>
<p>----</p>
<p><br />
The entry before Elizabeth ADAMS on the 1871 census - has another ADAMS family  - mother's Maiden name ASTON - on Gloucestershirebdm</p>
<p>George - 33<br />
Emma - 34<br />
Annie - 11 (1865 - Monmouth, Coleford)<br />
Giles - 10<br />
Eliza J - 3 (1863 Eliza Jane - Monmouth, Coleford<br />
Ada - 6 (1865) - Monmouth, Coleford<br />
James - 4<br />
George E - 1</p>
<p>Gloucestershirebdm</p>
<p>George ADAMS - married Emma ASTON - Forest of Dean, Monmouth, Register Office 1859</p>
<p>This tree is on Ancestry:</p>
<p>George ADAMS (father Giles) - married Emma ASTON SMITH - 3 September 1859 - Baptists Chapel, Monmouth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45498</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45498</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 07:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>MPGriffiths</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>William Adams 1826(?) - 1870</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm trying to place William Adams in the 1851/1841 census, so I can establish his parents and siblings. What I DO know is this:<br />
 - He married ELIZABETH CUTTER at the Doward Chapel in Whitchurch on 5th August 1862. The marriage certificate describes him as a bachelor age 37, labourer, residence: Monmouth, and his father is Jonathan Adams, labourer. Witnesses were Mary Ann Berry (nee CUTTER, and the bride's sister) and her husband John Berry. (This marriage does not appear in the FoDFHT Parish Records Transcripts).<br />
 - I'm pretty convinced I've found him in the 1861 census a year earlier, he's a lodger in the DREW household in Monmouth <strong><strong><strong>WILLIAM ADDAMS, lodger, unmarried, 36, born Glostershire Joyford</strong></strong></strong> - and his fellow lodgers are the witnesses at his marriage, John and Mary Ann Berry. I can't make out the street name but it could be Cross Keys Lane, and I think it was just off Agincourt Square, but I can't find it on Google Earth.<br />
 - William and Elizabeth's first child George Adams was baptised at Christchurch Berry Hill on 23/10/1862. Residence is Joyford, occupation: labourer.<br />
 - Second child Mary Ann Adams was also baptised at Christchurch on 20/2/1865. Residence is Joyford, occupation: labourer.<br />
 - Third child William Henry (my G-Grandfather) was baptised at English Bicknor on 1/3/1868. Residence is Joyford Hill, occupation: labourer.<br />
 - William dies before the 1871 census. Wife Elizabeth is a widow, and there is a 4th child Elizabeth Adams, who is described as 2 months old, and if this is correct, William would have died sometime in the previous 11 months.</p>
<p>I have found what I think may be William's burial record <br />
Record ID: 16820 Entry Number: 2640 <br />
Year: 1870, Month: Mar, Day: 2<br />
Surname: ADAMS<br />
Forenames: William<br />
Residence: Joyford Lane<br />
Age at death: 44<br />
Officiating Minister: J Burdon<br />
Event: Burial<br />
from 1813 Page No: 140 Parish Chapel: English Bicknor  <br />
The problem with this is that he seems to have died before his 4th child was conceived!!</p>
<p>The 1851 census provides 2 possible families for William. The first, Class: HO107; Piece: 1959; Folio: 335; Page: 5; GSU roll: 87359, gives the following:<br />
Quarrymans Arms or Ancient Britain(?), East Dean St Paul's<br />
 John Adams, head, m, 55, victualler &amp; quarryman, born East Dean <br />
 Mary Adams, wife, m, 56, born Monmouthshire Chepstow <br />
 William Adams, son, u, 26, quarryman, born East Dean <br />
 George Adams, son, u, 25, quarryman, born East Dean  <br />
 Mary Ann Adams, dau, u, 20, born East Dean   <br />
 Robert Adams, son, u, 17, quarryman, born East Dean </p>
<p>The other possibility is Class: HO107; Piece: 1959; Folio: 336; Page: 6; GSU roll: 87359<br />
East Dean St Paul's<br />
 Margreat Adams, head, w, 62, victualler, born East Dean <br />
 Henry Adams, son, u, 27, quarryman, born East Dean <br />
 William Adams, son, u, 26, quarryman, born East Dean  <br />
 Joseph Adams, son, u, 24, quarryman, born East Dean  <br />
 Carraline Adams, daur, u, 22, born East Dean <br />
 Ann James, serv, u, 16, born East Dean </p>
<p>As you can see, the entries for both of these Williams are identical! So which, if either, can we rule out?</p>
<p>There is a baptism entry that could resolve this in favour of the first family at the Quarryman's Arms. </p>
<p> record_id 133551 Entry Number 614 Year 1824 Month May Day 16 Parents Surname ADAMS Child Forename(s) William Adams Marmont Father's Forename(s) John Mother's Forename(s) Mary Mother's Surname Place of Residence Forest of Dean Occupation Quarryman Officiating Minister C P N Wilton Sub Curate Event type Baptism Memoranda Notes Register Reference P50 IN1/1 Page No 77 Parish Chapel: Blakeney.</p>
<p>The problem with this one is the child's forenames. Could this be a transcription error? </p>
<p>I'm sorry this post is so long-winded! Can anyone provide me with any insights that will have me slapping my forehead?</p>
<p>Many thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45497</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=45497</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 04:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>nigeldownunder</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
