<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Forest of Dean FHT  Forum - Richard VAUGHAN of Ruardean 1702-1777</title>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/</link>
<description>Connecting Forest of Dean Researchers World-Wide </description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Richard VAUGHAN of Ruardean 1702-1777 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly a man owning land would be able to vote but I am not sure whether the statement you found may also be correct. It will need more research before dismissing it as a misinterpretation. Perhaps someone else will be able to shed more light onto it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=33617</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=33617</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>rookancestrybest</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Richard VAUGHAN of Ruardean 1702-1777 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments. It sounds as if I have been misled by the words &quot;were voted freeholders of the parish in the county elections 1776.&quot; Should the wording have been &quot;voted in the 1776 county election because they were freeholders of the parish&quot; It seems you were not voted to be a freeholder but rather you were entitled to vote as a freeholder because you owned property. Is this the correct interpretation? Thanks again</p>
<p>Peter I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=33578</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=33578</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 08:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>isherwop</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Richard VAUGHAN of Ruardean 1702-1777 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In laypersons' terms, most people (male or female) could not vote in the early 1700s, but landownership was the qualification for being able to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=33576</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=33576</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 20:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>rookancestrybest</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Richard VAUGHAN  County Elections 1776 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>previous thread  - <strong>The Poll at the Election of a <span style="color:#c00;">Knight</span> of the Shire of Gloucester 1776</strong> (on Google Books)</p>
<p>On the prefix : Begun on Monday 6th and continued until Friday 17 May 1776 </p>
<p>The Hon. George Cranfield BERKELEY and William Bromley CHEFTER Esq: Candidates</p>
<p>Henry Lippincott Esq: - High Sheriff</p>
<p><br />
---</p>
<p>looks like 'George' won!  - click on the picture (enlarges)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.grosvenorprints.com/stock.php?artist=Gainsborough%2C+Thomas&amp;WADbSearch1-submit">http://www.grosvenorprints.com/stock.php?artist=Gainsborough%2C+Thomas&amp;WADbSearch1-...</a><br />
-------</p>
<p>more background re: LIPPINCOTT and CHESTER</p>
<p><a href="http://www.trinity-bris.ac.uk/1765-1829">http://www.trinity-bris.ac.uk/1765-1829</a></p>
<p>-----</p>
<p><br />
and on page 126 of the Book on Google</p>
<p>Townthip : Ruardean</p>
<p>Freeholders Name:  <strong>Richard VAUGHAN</strong></p>
<p>Of What Freehold confifts:  Meffusage and Lands</p>
<p>In Whole Tenure: Himfelf</p>
<p>-----</p>
<p><br />
Townthip:  Ruardean</p>
<p>Freeholders Name: VAUGHAN  John</p>
<p>Of What Freehold confifts: - Meffusage and Lands</p>
<p>In Whole Tenure:  Himfelf and James MOTLOE</p>
<p><br />
-----</p>
<p><br />
Townthip: Ruardean</p>
<p>Freeholders Name: VAUGHAN Richard Jnr</p>
<p>Of What Freehold confifts: Houfe and land</p>
<p>In Whole Tenture: Himfelf</p>
<p>------------------</p>
<p><a href="http://www.forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=19101">http://www.forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=19101</a></p>
<p><br />
The Gloucestershire Records Office hold records - if you type in the search box <strong>County Election 1776</strong>  (you get more hits if you don't put the<strong> s</strong> after Election)  - and even more   (440 hits)  if you just type in <strong>1776</strong></p>
<p><br />
there are  'many hits'</p>
<p>inc: Letter to the Gentlemen, Clergy &amp; Freeholders of the County of Gloucester</p>
<p>Copies can be obtained from the Records Office</p>
<p><a href="http://ww3.gloucestershire.gov.uk/DServe/DServe.exe?dsqApp=Archive&amp;dsqDb=Catalog&amp;dsqCmd=Search.tcl.">http://ww3.gloucestershire.gov.uk/DServe/DServe.exe?dsqApp=Archive&amp;dsqDb=Catalog&am...</a></p>
<p><br />
--</p>
<p><br />
Vaughan of Ruardean (family tree)</p>
<p><a href="http://homepages.poptel.org.uk/waltking/FH/index.htm">http://homepages.poptel.org.uk/waltking/FH/index.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=33563</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=33563</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 07:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>m p griffiths</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Richard VAUGHAN of Ruardean 1702-1777</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a reference I have read Richard Vaughan and his sons John and Richard were elected to be freeholders of the parish in the county elections of 1776. Please can anyone tell me a bit more about what this means, who would have voted and, where the records would be accessible.Thanks<br />
Peter I New Zealand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=33562</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=33562</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 01:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>isherwop</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
