<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Forest of Dean FHT  Forum - Marriage - 25 Apr 1948</title>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/</link>
<description>Connecting Forest of Dean Researchers World-Wide </description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Marriage - 25 Apr 1948 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I was not positive I was correct so didn't like to presume.</p>
<p>Thank you for clearing that up for me.</p>
<p>Hope you are enjoying the sunshine. Chilly downunder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=49839</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=49839</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2018 20:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>ritpetite</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Marriage - 25 Apr 1948 (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We thank you for bringing this to our notice, have since checked the transcript against original and agree that Thomas Jones married Eliza Haile. The database has therefore been corrected.<br />
It is perhaps worth mentioning at this time that there is a Database Correction Request Form for cases of this nature (see drop down list under Help-FAQ in the Top Menu). It is a straightforward form to complete and when submitted is delivered to a member of the team who has access to originals (not all are on Ancestry).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=49837</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=49837</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 19:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Marriage - 25 Apr 1948</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in a conundrum. I have two marriages of Thomas Jones, same father, occupation, widowed marrying 1. Eliza Haile, father Israel &amp; 2. Jane Haile, father Israel, in the same church on the same day.</p>
<p>One entry is on the Forest of Dean site the other is the actual record scanned on Ancestry.</p>
<p>Register reference from FOD site: P85/1 IN 1/4, Page number 21, Cinderford St John, <br />
Groom ref J520, Bride ref H400.</p>
<p><br />
Jane Haile married John Barnes 1850 so I think the correct bride is Eliza. which means FOD have transcribed it wrong.</p>
<p>This is the only conclusion I can come to.</p>
<p>Help haha. <br />
Rita</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=49835</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=49835</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 19:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>ritpetite</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
