<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Forest of Dean FHT  Forum - NK on census form</title>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/</link>
<description>Connecting Forest of Dean Researchers World-Wide </description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>NK on census form (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gordon</p>
<p>It could be that someone else supplied the information for that person and so may not have known his birthplace.</p>
<p>Simone x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=12654</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=12654</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>Simone</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>NK on census form</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently downloaded a census form and underneath the 'Where Born' column were the letters N K.</p>
<p>I take this to be short for 'Not Known'. Is it possible that in 1901 someone of 42 did not know where they were born? Or is there a more suble interpretation, eg, not wishing to be traced?</p>
<p>Gordon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=12653</link>
<guid>https://forum.forest-of-dean.net/index.php?id=12653</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
<category>General</category><dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
