ROOK/RUCK/RUCH - Forest of Dean FHT Forum

The spellings I have are Rook and Rooke though it is possible that the others are related as well as those called Ruk.

Complete thread:

RSS Feed of thread

Thomas ROOK 1784-1844 - Is this an 1840s photo of him? admin 2009-10-31, 02:06 AM
- 1840s photography slowhands 2009-10-31, 07:01 AM
  - 1840s photography rookancestrybest 2009-10-31, 09:45 PM
- Thomas ROOK 1784-1844 - Is this an 1840s photo of him? m p griffiths 2009-10-31, 07:10 AM
  - Thomas ROOK 1784-1844 - Is this an 1840s photo of him? admin 2009-10-31, 09:14 AM
    - Reply from Roger Vaughan admin 2009-10-31, 09:45 AM
      - Reply from Roger Vaughan m p griffiths 2009-10-31, 11:04 AM
        
        Reply from Roger Vaughan rookancestrybest 2009-10-31, 09:51 PM
      - Reply from Roger Vaughan rookancestrybest 2009-10-31, 09:50 PM
    - Thomas ROOK 1784-1844 - Is this an 1840s photo of him? rookancestrybest 2009-10-31, 09:47 PM
- ROOK/RUCK/RUCH m p griffiths 2009-10-31, 12:09 PM
  - Thomas ROOK prior thread slowhands 2009-10-31, 12:14 PM
    - Thomas ROOK prior thread rookancestrybest 2009-10-31, 10:00 PM
  - ROOK/RUCK/RUCH rookancestrybest 2009-10-31, 09:53 PM
  - ROOK/RUCK/RUCH rookancestrybest 2009-10-31, 10:12 PM
- Thomas ROOK 1784-1844 - Is this an 1840s photo of him? Roger Griffiths 2009-10-31, 12:57 PM
  - Thomas ROOK 1784-1844 - Is this an 1840s photo of him? rookancestrybest 2009-10-31, 09:56 PM
- Thomas ROOK 1784-1844 - Is this an 1840s photo of him? AnneRafferty 2009-10-31, 01:08 PM
  - Thomas ROOK 1784-1844 - Is this an 1840s photo of him? rookancestrybest 2009-10-31, 09:59 PM
- Does it help to know the size of the photograph? rookancestrybest 2009-10-31, 11:12 PM