Gile/James Griffiths (General)

by pam Vowles , west sussex, Sunday, March 26, 2006, 02:21 (6609 days ago)

Please can someone help me before I lose 5 generations on my family tree.( and turn to drink)
In slowhands post of 24 Oct 2005 he shows the 1841 census showing Giles 40 Sarah 45 Mary 20 James 15 Ann 10 George 8? Henry 6 Thomas 4 and Giles 1.
In my tree working up I know my George was born 1832/3 in the Forest of Dean and had a brother Thomas brn 1837/8, they both went to the same place in Northumberland abt 1870 something.
I have rightly or wrongly linked them to Giles and Sarah of the 1841 census.
A relative in New Zealand has obtained Georges marriage cert which I know is correct because of his wifes name, on it he states father JAMES!
George named his sons Evan, Thomas and Giles.( no James)
Another brother on the 1841 census Henry moved to Northumberland.
Any advice on how to solve this would be very much appreciated.
Pam