Edward Ernest WORGAN 1895 Woolaston (General)

by biddy @, Monday, August 08, 2011, 20:52 (4859 days ago) @ normanelkins

Hi Norman

Yes, sorry, Ernest's (Earnest/Edward/Ewart!) burial should read 52 - sadly a senior moment! Also as Slowhands says, names can often be read in different ways by different people. The Woolaston registers had actually been transcribed locally before the Family History project got under way, and that version definitely has Ernest Edward. It's usually pretty accurate but I'll try to remember to doublecheck next time I'm at the Archives.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum