Putrid Fever and Cholera ... (General)
by rookancestrybest 
, United Kingdom, Saturday, March 10, 2012, 19:05 (4644 days ago) @ mrsbruso
The putrid or black fever could have been the disease, in fact I thought it was. Cholera is a different disease (it is not typhus) it was the cholera epidemic dates that the date does not coincide with.
Complete thread:
- 1854 Possible epidemic? -
lesleyr,
2012-03-05, 16:05
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- 1854 Possible epidemic? - slowhands, 2012-03-05, 16:08
- 1854 Possible epidemic? -
Roger Griffiths,
2012-03-05, 18:42
- Sickness in the 1850s -- Garndiffaith -
mrsbruso,
2012-03-06, 12:36
- Sickness in the 1850s -- Garndiffaith -
Todd07064,
2012-03-06, 19:14
- Sickness in the 1850s -- Garndiffaith -
mrsbruso,
2012-03-06, 23:54
- Sickness in the 1850s -- Garndiffaith - Todd07064, 2012-03-07, 13:25
- Sickness in the 1850s -- Garndiffaith -
mrsbruso,
2012-03-06, 23:54
- Putrid Fever and Cholera ... -
rookancestrybest,
2012-03-06, 21:35
- Putrid Fever and Cholera ... -
mrsbruso,
2012-03-06, 23:52
- Putrid Fever and Cholera ... - rookancestrybest, 2012-03-10, 19:05
- Putrid Fever and Cholera ... -
mrsbruso,
2012-03-06, 23:52
- Sickness in the 1850s -- Garndiffaith -
Todd07064,
2012-03-06, 19:14
- Sickness in the 1850s -- Garndiffaith -
mrsbruso,
2012-03-06, 12:36
- 1854 Possible epidemic? - lesleyr, 2012-03-07, 18:19