Isaac MEREDITH 1823 - Littledean & Cinderford - prior thread (General)
Thanks Slowhands, they're interesting leads and sure in someway related, but there are inconsistancies with Sarah and her age in the various threads. The 1841 Littledean bit looks correct but the sibling potentials (whilst some could be), dont all stack up as Sarah wouldnt be of child bearing age for some candidates.
Thank anyway and if someone could narrow the search down further, I'd be most grateful.
Complete thread:
- Meredith's - Littledean & Cinderford -
unknown,
2012-11-04, 21:29
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- Meredith's - Littledean & Cinderford -
Paul Andrews,
2012-11-04, 22:27
- Meredith's - Littledean & Cinderford - unknown, 2012-11-08, 18:21
- MEREDITH/JONES/PARKER Burslem -
m p griffiths,
2012-11-04, 22:54
- MEREDITH/JONES/PARKER Burslem - unknown, 2012-11-08, 18:27
- Isaac MEREDITH 1823 - Littledean & Cinderford - prior thread -
slowhands,
2012-11-04, 23:04
- Isaac MEREDITH 1823 - Littledean & Cinderford - prior thread - unknown, 2012-11-12, 19:59
- Meredith's - Littledean & Cinderford -
Paul Andrews,
2012-11-04, 22:27