George MEEK Ruardean Hill (General)
Hi Wilfred
I have tried to respond to your email to me, but even though I used the "reply" facility and had therefore not misinterpreted your email address, it was nevertheless rejected by your ISP due to the address.
You had been confused by the 1871 Census entry so I had attached an image of the actual entry for 1861 & 1871.
Please note the entry for 1871 posted by slowhands is wrong (unusual for slowhands) it is definitely Dinah not Sarah on the 1871 census.
Jim Ashton
Complete thread:
- George MEEK Ruardean Hill -
wilfred,
2007-11-03, 03:59
- George MEEK 1839 Ruardean Hill - assoc. thread - slowhands, 2007-11-03, 04:28
- George MEEK 1841-1890 Mitcheldean (in Talywain 1871) -
slowhands,
2007-11-03, 04:35
- Richard MEEK 1873 Lancs -
slowhands,
2007-11-15, 05:17
- Richard MEEK 1873 Lancs -
wilfred,
2007-11-15, 07:32
- Florrie TRAVISS 1880 - slowhands, 2007-11-15, 08:16
- Richard MEEK 1873 Lancs -
wilfred,
2007-11-15, 07:32
- Richard MEEK 1873 Lancs -
slowhands,
2007-11-15, 05:17
- George MEEK Ruardean Hill -
jimashton,
2007-11-03, 06:21
- George MEEK Ruardean Hill -
wilfred,
2007-11-19, 23:20
- George MEEK Ruardean Hill -
jimashton,
2007-11-20, 01:43
- George MEEK Ruardean Hill -
Danny,
2007-11-22, 00:56
- George MEEK Ruardean Hill - jimashton, 2009-01-26, 05:06
- George MEEK Ruardean Hill -
Danny,
2007-11-22, 00:56
- George MEEK Ruardean Hill -
jimashton,
2007-11-20, 01:43
- George MEEK Ruardean Hill - reporter, 2007-11-22, 07:55
- Dinah & Emma THOMAS Littledean -
slowhands,
2009-01-25, 01:48
- Dinah & Emma THOMAS Littledean -
jimashton,
2009-01-26, 04:58
- Dinah & Emma THOMAS Littledean - slowhands, 2009-01-26, 05:31
- Dinah & Emma THOMAS Littledean -
jimashton,
2009-01-26, 04:58
- George MEEK Ruardean Hill -
wilfred,
2007-11-19, 23:20
- George MEEK Ruardean Hill -
jimashton,
2007-11-06, 01:44
- George MEEK Ruardean Hill - slowhands, 2007-11-06, 22:26